Plopperdeplop12345

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joël Galliard (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joël Galliard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 23:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Plopperdeplop12345! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 23:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Plopperdeplop12345. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Joël Galliard, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Joël Galliard

The basic rule in respect to notability (WP:GNG) is that there is significant coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources. Social media websites (Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X etc) and sites such as SoundCloud and Bandcamp are generally created by the individual and are therefore primary sources i.e. not independent. Sources such as Reddit, Discord etc are collections of personal views/comments without any degree of fact checking or verifiability. This is why these are not considered as acceptable or reliable sources. What you need to find is more mainstream sources, such as newspapers/newsites, credible magazines and websites that do have an independent editorial oversight and are recognised for the fact checking. I hope that helps. Dan arndt (talk) 03:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)