Ploxhoi
Welcome
editWelcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
- Respect intellectual property rights - do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view when editing articles - this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account being blocked from editing.
The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Sdrtirs (talk) 02:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
editHello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:09, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Cannabis
editPlease stop adding "cannabis" to the Holy anointing oil article, I know you believe it, but there's a discussion on the Talk page, as you know since you are posting there. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:04, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- As you can see, from the Talk page, there is evidence and to make the article neutral both should views should be included in the article. Removing "cannabis" is a biased opinion that there is no possible way "cannabis" was in fact the original ingredient. In order to keep the article neutral "cannabis" was added along with calamus to show there is a debated inconstancy with the facts. Several different members of Wikipedia have also noted that removing the "cannabis" discuss link was biased. If you think the link should be removed because of whatever reason you have, please add to the talk page and be very convincing why the article should be biased. Ploxhoi (talk) 19:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- When you are asked not to add something you don't put it straight back. See Talk. Until there is a reliable source you cannot add this. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:36, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- I see you just want to keep the article from a biased perspective, even though I have included reliable evidence from a Zoroastrian aspect. Ploxhoi (talk) 19:45, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yes that's right I want the "bias" of sources about the Hebrew Bible to be about the Hebrew Bible, or at least Judaism and not about Zoroastrianism. If you want to insert comment about Zoroastrianism then please do it into an article about Zoroastrianism not Judaism please. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:19, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- That is a very biased comment masked in ignorance. The Hebrew Bible and Judaism were influenced by Zoroastrianism and to flatly ignore facts is not what being a scholar is about. Very saddened and disappointed by your comment. Ploxhoi (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yes that's right I want the "bias" of sources about the Hebrew Bible to be about the Hebrew Bible, or at least Judaism and not about Zoroastrianism. If you want to insert comment about Zoroastrianism then please do it into an article about Zoroastrianism not Judaism please. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:19, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- I see you just want to keep the article from a biased perspective, even though I have included reliable evidence from a Zoroastrian aspect. Ploxhoi (talk) 19:45, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
AN/I discussion
editThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Til Eulenspiegel.The discussion is about the topic Holy anointing oil. Thank you. Mangoe (talk) 17:22, 31 January 2014 (UTC)