Could you please reupload your watermark-free versions of the photos over existing ones, not creating a new page? I really appreaciate your work. It's great to see other graphist help us. Please, keep your great work. Thanks. Vearthy (talk) 17:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of IssueTrak

edit
 

The article IssueTrak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject's notability is not indicated. Third-party sources are trivial company data lists, not related to product and not significant coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of IssueTrak for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IssueTrak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IssueTrak until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:56, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of IssueTrak

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on IssueTrak, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

The page has been deleted. If you would like to create a page in your user space, User:Pluta0/IssueTrak is the place to do so. Other editors can see it and if you want, can offer suggestions for improvement. Once that page meets Wikipedia's requirements, we can arrange to have it moved to the main space. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply