Plutoheart

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Plutoheart/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:15, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Plutoheart! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:15, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Plutoheart. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. This is regarding Tres Birds. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Hello Plutoheart. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Plutoheart. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Plutoheart|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. This is regarding Tres Birds. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I'm really overwhelmed by all this. I have never done a Wikipedia page before, and I had no idea about all this. I'm also not great when everything is sent in code. It seems pretty harsh when I'm asking for advice. Plutoheart (talk) 16:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Where do I write that I am working on behalf of a company? On my page? There's so much information my head is swimming. Plutoheart (talk) 16:28, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

With respect, perhaps you shouldn't have accepted the assignment, then, if you don't know how the system works.

I don't know what you mean by "everything is sent in code".

Your next edit must be to formally disclose your paid editing status on your user page, as instructed above. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:28, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

My Conflict of Interest

I am paid to create pages on Wikipedia on behalf of Nicole Straus PR Plutoheart (talk) 16:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

No, not here, on your user page User:Plutoheart. This is just a discussion page, and may get blanked or archived etc., whereas your paid editing disclosure needs to stay on permanently.

If it would help, I can do that for you. However, you must check it to ensure it is correct, as the disclosure should be coming from you, not from me. I will say that employer=Nicole Straus PR and client=Tres Birds, as that is how I've understood what you've stated. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

I would very much appreciate that. I honestly didn't know. I've been looking at other architect practices on Wikipedia and they seem far from neutral to me.

Thank you Plutoheart (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Plutoheart/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Plutoheart/sandbox

Hello, Plutoheart. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Plutoheart/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)