Por Por 2

January 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Thai Airways International you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.--Ucd1990 (talk) 07:07, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Qantasplanes (talk) 11:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, including repeatedly removing article content without explanation, attempting to exercise ownership of articles, by telling others they may not edit, repeatedly adding content which you have been told is incompatible with the accepted standards for a Wikipedia article, and edit warring over a period of several months. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  JamesBWatson (talk) 15:48, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Thai pilot a340, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Snoozlepet (talk) 06:29, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:39, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Por Por 2, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Grayfell (talk) 05:57, 4 April 2013 (UTC)