Ppzjld

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jahn-Teller effect (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jahn-Teller effect and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Consensus, cooperation, and technical level

Although not your intentions, it is bad manners around here to overwrite a mature article in one shot without explanation. We tend to discuss things a little to help guide the extent and level of our editing. We also tend to do edits in bits. A good place to start is to review some of these brief policies WP:TECHNICAL, WP:NOTJOURNAL, WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. Having said that, it would be great if your group's efforts could be brought into Wikipedia. --Smokefoot (talk) 23:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Kudos, but

While I was one who put out the general word in the JT community about how bad the state of affairs was at this article, and welcome the input that is represented in its >43,000 bytes of edited content—information in wikipedia must be verifiable, and what you have added, largely is not. Too much of wikipedia is "just trust us". To add such an enormous new section in this way, in 2017, is unacceptable. I will propose to others that your long edit be placed elsewhere, and not in the main article space, until such time that the content can be very specifically tied to its sources. Said another, more personal way: I have taught OChem, Chem. Biol., spectroscopy and lab courses related to OChem, etc. at major research universities over the years. Yet, I still do not, on my expertise, add content in these types of articles from my head, or from my extensive teaching notes. I only add content if there are good secondary sources from which I can draw and point to (often the finest texts and advanced texts and reviews, from which I base my teaching). This is because we are not allowed to present material based on our own expertise. If we can, anyine can, and you and I do not want anyone doing this. For this reason, see WP:VERIFY, content must be sourced. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 04:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jahn-Teller effect concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jahn-Teller effect, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)