Pranith cr

March 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, White dwarf, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Did not get u

What is citation

Pranith cr (talk) 02:33, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

You need to tell what reliable source supports your claim. —C.Fred (talk) 02:39, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

On further review, the text you're trying to add is already in the introduction to the article. We don't need it there twice. —C.Fred (talk) 02:41, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Below

Reliable source ? I want this wikipedia to become the reliable source so I am adding my knowledge to this and also want to spread the fame of sir Chandrasekhar. This info is globally accepted and I wrote it have chances. Pranith cr (talk) 02:42, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

They

They didn't write that it have chances to become a black hole Pranith cr (talk) 02:45, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

The details about becoming a black hole are better covered at the article on the Chandrasekhar limit. —C.Fred (talk) 02:47, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Y

But we need it near the introduction isn't it Pranith cr (talk) 02:50, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

It's enough to say that it may explode in a carbon detonation. —C.Fred (talk) 02:54, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

But

But everyone will not understand it as a black hole Pranith cr (talk) 02:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

But it might not even become a black hole. That's why it's better to say it will blow up like a supernova would. —C.Fred (talk) 02:58, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

It

It may also become a black hole there is a evidence Pranith cr (talk) 02:59, 9 March 2018 (UTC)