Welcome!

edit
Hello, Progüvo06! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 16:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Occhiali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

November 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Roundish. An edit that you recently made to Zeigarnik effect seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Roundishtc) 22:27, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022

edit

  Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Mediterranean Fleet. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please read MOS:CAPTION. - David Biddulph (talk) 10:50, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of French possessions and colonies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tagant.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

February 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm TylerBurden. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 06:06, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2023

edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! DuncanHill (talk) 14:12, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023

edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Civil–military relations, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:37, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Italian culture (1700s), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enlightenment.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join New pages patrol

edit
 

Hello Progüvo06!

  • The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
  • We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
  • Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
  • If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your lack of edit summaries or talk page engagement is unacceptable.

edit

Both are required, H:FIES says among other things that "According to the consensus policy, all edits should be explained (unless the reason for them is obvious)—either by clear edit summaries, or by discussion on the associated talk page. It is a good practice to provide a meaningful summary for every edit, especially when reverting (undoing) the actions of other editors or deleting existing text; otherwise, people may question your motives for the edit. In appropriate circumstances, a summary can be quite brief ("ce" and "rvv" for example)." You aren't doing that. Responding to messages on you talk page is a key part of collaboration, and I've blocked a number of editors for never responding. You are experienced enough that you should be aware of all of this, so if it continues I'll either take you to ANI or block you myself - which would be easiest and not waste anyone else's time. Doug Weller talk 10:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Majority decision, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Striking.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Stroganov School

edit

Is there a reason you moved Stroganov school to Stroganov School after there was a RM that was recently closed with consensus to have this in lowercase? Mellk (talk) 17:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have moved it back. If you think this should not be the title, please start a new RM. Thanks. Mellk (talk) 18:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your Moving a page

edit

Hello,

You moved a page, presumably because you thought the title did not conform with American English. I added the location, with its second word in lower case, because that is how it is recorded in the French language. Can you please use the talk page the next time that you are looking to move a page. Keith H99 (talk) 12:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Undiscussed page move of Cortesi brothers

edit

I notice you recently boldly moved the article about the Cortesi brothers to Cortesi Brothers without any discussion, nor explaining your move in the move edit summary. This move is contrary to the Manual of Style guideline for article titles and Wikipedia's naming conventions for the capitalization of article titles which states: Do not capitalize the second or subsequent words in an article title, unless the title is a proper name. This group of siblings does not appear to be a performing act and the word "brothers" is not capitalized in the running text of the article when referring to them. So the title does not appear to be a proper name of the group. I have moved the article back to the previous title because this was not discussed nor explained, and did not follow the due process for articles that have been at a particular title for a long time. Please request a single page move if you think the capitalisation of this article is incorrect, providing a reason why the word "brothers" needs to be capitalized. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 18:38, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

More issues with your editing

edit

Is there a reason why you capitalized "local"? Is it a special, defined term or proper noun?

I am warning you: If you continue these edits without responding to concerns on your talk page, you will end up having your editing privileges revoked, and may have to explain yourself on WP:ANI.⸺(Random)staplers 17:36, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edi Summaries

edit

Hi Progüvo06,

Obviously this is just a suggestion, I can't compel you to do this, but it'd be very helpful if you included edit summaries in your work. I look over all edits on articles on my watchlist (which you have been editing a lot recently) and it would be helpful to not have to manually go through each one to find out what is being edited!

Just a thought, happy editing :) sovietblobfish (talk) 17:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply