Welcome to my Talk Page. If you're new to Wikipedia, you can leave me a message about a new topic by placing it at the bottom of this talk page, under a new heading with a title that refers to the article or topic in question. To create a header, just put two sets of equals signs on each side of the section's title. Please sign your message by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of the message, which also automatically time stamps them. Thanks!

Chaos Monkeys

edit

Thanks for creating an article for my new book Chaos Monkeys. Unfortunately, the linked name actually goes to a Spanish cyclist that is definitely not me. To my knowledge, I don't have a Wikipedia page. Imagine either that should be remedied, or the link removed. In case you opt for the former, there's a basic bio at Everipedia: https://www.everipedia.com/antonio-garcia-martinez/

There's also a longer-form bio at my author site: http://www.antoniogarciamartinez.com/about-antonio-garcia-martinez/

Antoniogm (talk) 03:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi Antoniogm, I didn't link to the Spanish cyclist. After checking the article's history, Green22803 made that edit. Thank you for bringing that to my attention. Fixing it now. Progalaxy (talk)

Suggestion a Disambiguation page? Green22803 (talk) 13:10, 15 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Haley Tanner

edit

Hi, I'm Dschslava. Progalaxy, thanks for creating Haley Tanner!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Promotional language does not belong, neither do blurbs on books written.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Dschslava Δx parlez moi 05:54, 15 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Paperboys Fable has been accepted

edit
 
A Paperboys Fable, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 04:44, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Progalaxy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. I noted via the SPI that it's possible that you may be a paid editor. I'm posting this to ensure that you received notice of this via all of the various other stuff. Be extremely careful about writing things in a promotional manner because if it's believed that you are a paid editor and aren't disclosing it, you could still be blocked from editing if there's evidence enough. I don't mean this to sound harsh, just that I've seen people get blocked for this even without having some ties to a sockpuppeteer, so you need to be extra careful here. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deep Patel (author) (December 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 06:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Due.com (December 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 22:58, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Caleb Maddix

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Caleb Maddix, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Draft:Due.com for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Draft:Due.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Due.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Your draft article, Draft:Deep Patel (author)

edit
 

Hello, Progalaxy. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Deep Patel".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 23:26, 15 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antonio Garcia Martinez (August 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToThAc was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ToThAc (talk) 14:05, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Progalaxy, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ToThAc (talk) 14:05, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natalie Dyer (August 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 07:55, 26 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhavik Sarkhedi (September 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jupitus Smart 12:30, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Antonio Garcia Martinez concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Antonio Garcia Martinez, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Natalie Dyer concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Natalie Dyer, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Bhavik Sarkhedi concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bhavik Sarkhedi, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 13 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Antonio Garcia Martinez

edit
 

Hello, Progalaxy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Antonio Garcia Martinez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 11:43, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Natalie Dyer

edit
 

Hello, Progalaxy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Natalie Dyer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 18:39, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Bhavik Sarkhedi

edit
 

Hello, Progalaxy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bhavik Sarkhedi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 18:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Bhavik Sarkhedi

edit
 

Hello, Progalaxy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bhavik Sarkhedi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:44, 22 August 2021 (UTC)Reply