Pruva
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Have you ever read sources ? -- Takabeg (talk) 22:16, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
That source is not enough proof to base assumptions on someone whose family lineage today can be tracked and is well known, and is of Turkish descent. I have explained this in discussion too. Just because something is referred doesn't mean it can overcome the obvious fact. That is my first point. Second point is, although I may be new in wikipedia, I know what a vandalism is and also checked the definition which states it is about all kinds of nonsense editting of the pages. I am open to all kind of constructive criticism and would uphold the truth in matters above all else but... Where is nonsense in this matter I want to ask (see my first point).--Pruva (talk) 22:40, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Here I have provided the issue with ample resources with first hand reliability - the resources of that period. Both of Turkish origin and of European.--Pruva (talk) 23:20, 2 September 2011 (UTC)