Przybylop

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noah Zuhdi (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NiklausGerard was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noah Zuhdi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Noah Zuhdi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NiklausGerard (talk) 05:14, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Przybylop! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NiklausGerard (talk) 05:14, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noah Zuhdi (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Alexandermcnabb were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noah Zuhdi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:24, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for taking time to review the page. I am hoping you may take additional time in clarifying feedback for me. The article focuses on his boxing accomplishments for the vast majority of the time, which has me questioning the, "As a businessperson, the subject would not normally be notable." His work in businesses is a merely a sidenote to it. Would taking the business part out make this article worth approving? If not, then I also have questions about the reliable sources. Even according to Wikipedia, The Oklahoman or The Daily Oklahoman (as it was once known as) is the largest newspaper in Oklahoma and is essentially the state's paper of record. There are several articles from there cited in this draft. Credentials and info from both BoxRec.com (which nearly every boxer in Wikipedia has citations to) and ESPN.com are also there. The Norman Transcript was also cited as a reliable source, and the publication has its own Wikipedia entry. The Oklahoma Gazette was cited as a reliable source, and it, too, has its own Wikipedia entry. I've seen multiple boxers with less citations and less credible citations make it onto here. Almost every article has Zuhdi in its title and as its main focus. I'm wondering how/where to edit this. Thank you, again. Przybylop (talk) 18:25, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noah Zuhdi (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noah Zuhdi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 08:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the notes. I believe I have corrected the problems or made sufficient progress in addressing them. The record and table is cited. The inconsistent punctuation/placement of citations has been largely corrected, too. Przybylop (talk) 16:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Would there be any way for you to take another look at this now that things have been adjusted or corrected? Przybylop (talk) 01:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noah Zuhdi has been accepted

Noah Zuhdi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 19:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)