Psprinc

Additions of http://.ictv.com

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.--Hu12 (talk) 22:57, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Spam in Cedar Point Communications

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Cedar Point Communications, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Cedar Point Communications is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Cedar Point Communications, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

CloudTV

Not sure what is going on with the CloudTV article. It looks like you replaced the Wikipedia-style article with one that is more of an advertisement. This might lead to its deletion, so is not a good idea. We need to use normal and neutral English (not jargon like "cloud solutions") if you want it to stay. W Nowicki (talk) 17:30, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2022

Hello Psprinc. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Psprinc. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Psprinc|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PICKLEDICAE🥒 14:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Quickplay Media, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Psprinc, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Psprinc|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:03, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Pickledicae - I did not see your message of 30 August before posting on 31 August - I am not familiar with the user page and template you cite, but will try to navigate it as best I can. Psprinc (talk) 23:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)