Image source problem with Image:Anouk Who's Your Momma.jpg

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Anouk Who's Your Momma.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse@ 14:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Anouk Who's Your Momma.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Anouk Who's Your Momma.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 16:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Caroemeraldbackitupint.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Caroemeraldbackitupint.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:27, 17 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Different Dutch charts

edit

Hi, Psycho (uh, no offense intended). I have reverted your recent edits to Jennifer Lopez discography, where you added and changed peaks for various singles in the Netherlands. The problem is that there are two charts commonly used here on WP, one is the Dutch Top 40; the other is the Single Top 100 chart, which is a component of the Top 40 chart. We prefer to use the Top 40 chart when a song has charted there, and that's why the Jennifer Lopez discography uses that one (check the NLD column heading). You made this same mistake back on 23 August, but unfortunately, the error wasn't explained to you. Now you know!

In general, you should always check the reference citations in an article you edit to make sure they confirm what you add or change. If the refs don't verify your changes, you either need to add the new source, or you've made a mistake with your changes. For the Lopez discography, you would have seen that the numbers you wanted to add didn't match the source being used (although you may not have realized why). Anyway, happy editing, — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 10:30, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Shocking Miss Emerald concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Shocking Miss Emerald, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Shocking Miss Emerald

edit
 

Hello Psycho84. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "The Shocking Miss Emerald".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Shocking Miss Emerald}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ilse DeLange, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marlboro. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Psycho84. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

February 2019

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Miss Montreal, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

 
The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:26, 16 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

I Can See Your Voice (Dutch season 4)

edit

Pinging @Psycho84 — You're invited!

Good day, i'm a contributor for I Can See Your Voice franchise. Let me cooperate you to join the project as a "volunteer" to edit pages. For your information, please read these "assignments".

Episode summaries

edit

If you're living in the Netherlands:

  1. Watch the entire episode of I Can See Your Voice on Wednesday at 20:30 (8:30 pm in 12-hour format), or earlier.
  2. On RTL XL through video on demand, search I Can See Your Voice and watch the latest entire episode, or all of today's episode highlights by "mystery singers' elimination order". If you haven't an account, please register here.

After that, in order to complete today's episode summary, follow these instructions:

Note: You need to bring writing materials (paper and ballpen) for assistance!

  1. On the second "lineup" row: At the beginning of the game, write down the contestants' names and all of seven mystery singers' aliases.
  2. On the third "elimination order" row: After each round, write Goed (good singer) or Slecht (bad singer) on depending on the outcome of an eliminated mystery singer. Repeat the process until the last remaining mystery singer.
  3. If "show" uses a contestant-based format, on the first "contestant" row: Followed by contestant, write  Y Ja if they choose to risk the money, or  N Nee if they choose to walk away the money.
Sample:
Guest artist
Airing date
Guest panelists:
  • Guest
Contestant: Name — Nee (€4,000)
Lineup:
  • 1. Name
    (Alias)
  • 2. Name
    (Alias)
  • 3. Name
    (Alias)
  • 4. Name
    (Alias)
  • 5. Name
    (Alias)
  • 6. Name
    (Alias)
  • 7. Name
    (Alias)
Elimination order:
  • 4. Name
    (Alias) — Goed
  • 3. Name
    (Alias) — Slecht
  • 7. Name
    (Alias) — Goed
  • 5. Name
    (Alias) — Slecht
  • 2. Name
    (Alias) — Goed
  • 6. Name
    (Alias) — Slecht
  • 1. Name
    (Alias) — Goed

After you completed all assignments, you can now edit your episode summary on this section.

Game mechanics

edit

I'm so sorry and I can't watch or stream I Can See Your Voice outside of the Netherlands. Can you please add the rounds and its mechanics for the fourth season, and then episode summaries for Wolter Kroes and Trijntje Oosterhuis episodes? Thank you gor the assistance and have fun. Saisønisse (talk) 13:50, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply