User talk:Pszczolak/sandboxBlanco

The article is straight to the point. I really like that. BFZ- mention the length of the Blacno ridge

MORPHOLOGY of the ridge:

There are some images available on wikipedia that you could use.

information like what kind of material or rock or any magmatic activity could be added.

You could add the magnitudes of the earthquakes to give the estimate of the how "large" or "weak" the earthquakes were (Tectonic activity, Historical).

reference #3 and #1 might not have come out the way you wanted it.

But I checked some other references and they are a legit and good variety.

Highlight: Straight to the point. Low: morphology could include more information about the material found, any geological features.

Other than that, "COULD YOU PLEASE WRITE MY ARTICLE!!!"

Peer Review from Tao

The article is very short, but just about enough for the readers to see what is going on. The article presents a good structure and reliable sources. The tone of the article is fine.for the Historical subsection, you could add a little more words to it, to just make it look like a paragraph, instead of a sentence. In the end, as a reader, I would appreciated more if there is a picture showing graphically what is going on and where it is on the map. And Great job overall! TaoCo (talk) 18:12, 5 June 2017 (UTC)