Pt67

October 2019

Please refrain from making major edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Michael Cohen (lawyer), without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a major change. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 23:47, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Ok, thank you. Therefore let's discuss. Please look at the Michael Sorrentino page - "convicted felon" not allowed. For Cohen, it *must* be included? Same jail. Both known for other endeavors (Cohen *was* known as Trump's lawyer). Yet Sorrentino seems to get preferential treatment? Let's discuss. Pt67 (talk) 23:57, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Pt67

Edit warring

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Michael Cohen (lawyer). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 23:51, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

I'd like to submit this to dispute resolution? Please explain your edits. Both Sorrentino and Cohen served jail time at the same Prison. Yet, the Editors are preventing the use of the word "convicted felon" in Mr. Sorrentino's page - and you are insisting that Cohen's page should include the term "convicted felon". This is inconsistent. Please explain.  Pt67 (talk) 23:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Pt67

If you'd read the information above, it explains my edits. Cheers, - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 23:57, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. But, unfortunately, you are not explaining why Michael Sorrentino cannot have "convincted felon" in his page - while Michael Cohen *must*. This is deeply troubling. Same jail. But only one of them (Sorrentino) has a financial interest in keeping his page clean. Please explain this anomaly, this inconsistency, you have not done so. Cheers to you. Pt67 (talk) 00:00, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Pt67

Your changes need to be discussed on the article talk page to gain consensus with other editors, not here. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 00:04, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Ok great, awesome, will do, thanks. Pt67 (talk) 00:09, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Pt67

Pt67, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pt67! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:10, 17 October 2019 (UTC)