Pughbear1

October 2016

Hello, I'm Agtx. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Numerical weather prediction without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. agtx 00:05, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Hunting down the biblical apocrypha

Hello. You should not introduce bias on Wikipedia by removing the presence of Apocrypha in editions of the Bible, nor use Quora (which is a forum) as if it was a reliable source. Veverve (talk) 13:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Warning

Hello, I'm Veverve. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to King James Version have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.

You should read WP:3RR. If you keep doing what you have been, you could be blocked. Feel free to ask here if you don't understand. Jonathunder (talk) 19:12, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Pughbear1, could you discuss your edits? Especially your recent one? Veverve (talk) 19:19, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Last warning

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at King James Version, you may be blocked from editing. Veverve (talk) 19:36, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 19:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

UTRS 39248

UTRS appeal #39248 has been declined.

Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia. It is not some place for you to present your opinions. Since it is clearly your only purpose on Wikipedia, and since you cannot see that your edits are inappropriate, I suggest you find a nice webhost and present your opinions all you wish. I'm afraid that your attitude and inability to collaboratively build an encyclopedia, without injecting your own opinion, leaves me no other choice. I must decline this unblock request. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:51, 7 January 2021 (UTC)