Pukerua

Welcome, but ... I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Core Practice, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Core Practice. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 08:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

ITIL/eTOM

Will you back me on the ITIL/eTOM issue? Charles T. Betz 19:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

ITIL talk page RFC

After the previous RFC on external links you stated "If I'd been here in time I'd have added my vote to drop both" and I notice that you have yet to comment on the current RFC which has been running for 8 days so far. This is a friendly highlight for you in case you missed it.—Ash (talk) 15:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)