Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

  1. Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
  2. Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
  3. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
  4. Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Hammersoft (talk) 14:14, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pulse Wave Solutions (SEO) (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

As a new editor, I made a mistake. I understand where I went wrong and am committed to ensuring it doesn't happen again. Pulse Wave Solutions (SEO) (talk) 06:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Great, please demonstrate your understanding by describing what specifically you did wrong, what you will do differently, and what productive edits you will make instead. This should include discussion of your violation of WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 07:39, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pulse Wave Solutions (SEO) (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

The profile name I gave was like a marketing agency. So I changed it to the company name. Pulse Wave Solutions (SEO) (talk) 06:04, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Your username may not be a company name at all. The company name can be a portion of your username, but it must indicate a specific individual(your real name is not required). You also need to address your inappropriate edits. 331dot (talk) 08:21, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Your username should not be your company name. That would still violate the username policy. jlwoodwa (talk) 07:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please place new posts at the bottom, so chronological order is maintained. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply"; the reply function is imperfect and does not work well in every situation. 331dot (talk) 08:21, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply