Pumba lt

AfD nomination of DIY Framework

I have nominated DIY Framework, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DIY Framework. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 21:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I saw what you did with the Linked data entry

Hello Pumba It!

I saw that you removed the "Buzzwords" category from the Linked data article. Thank you! And you did some other stuff to try to fix it up, which was good too.

Venting time: That article is a mess. It is so full of URLs and so little text content. And it is such a notable subject. I am sort of appalled that any one would have placed it in the "Buzzwords" category, that is just so sad. But the article looks, well, you saw it. I don't know if it is a case where everyone who participates needs to be included, which would not be so bad, if they were to take the time to add some text explaining the significance of their contribution (or if someone were to do that). But just a pile of links like that is no good. I'm not blaming you! I am merely a statistician and regulatory compliance type, so I don't want to take on a subject like the Linked data article in Wikipedia either! I just wanted to say hello, and thank you, as you were the only one on that talk page (other than someone way back in 2008 or so) that seemed to demonstrate any solid good sense! --FeralOink (talk) 17:25, 27 April 2012 (UTC)