User talk:Pumpmeup/Archive 2
![]() |
![]() |
||
User Page | Talk |
|
Thank you!
My RFA | ||
Thanks for your support in my recent request for adminship, which was successful. I'll do my best to justify the confidence you've placed in me! Dppowell 22:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC) |} |
My Rfa
Thanks for voting in my Rfa, which I withdrew from yesterday. Though I did not get promoted, I see this Rfa as being a success nonetheless. What I got out of this Rfa will help me to be a better, all around editor. Because of this Rfa I have decided to become better in other areas of editing. I'm not going to just be a vandalfighter. Though vandalfighting is good, being active in all areas of editing is even better. Have a nice day.--SJP 22:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Click "show" to see my message.
|
I've noticed your user talk problems...
And I'd like to suggest a quick fix. Why not just take the ending bits out? i.e. all </div>, </span>, </anything>'s you've got at the bottom? Then the template will carry on indefinitely even when people add new comments. Although that purple bit may be a problem, I don't know. BTW, lovely userspace setup you've got going here :-) Cheers, --Pumpmeup 19:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Good idea, thanks! Normally not closing HTML tags can cause a code break, meaning that nothing at all will get rendered . But looks like simply leaving them open works just fine. The purple thingy: Well, i like it, but this moving around isn't exactly the most interesting activity to do as it got rather tiresome by now. And thanks for the compliment about my user pages looks, im glad that im not the only one who likes it :) --Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 19:30, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
My recent RfA
Thank you for participating in my recent RfA. Although the voting ended at 36/22/5, there was no consensus to promote, and the RfA was unsuccessful. I would like the thank you nonetheless for supporting me during the RfA, and hope that any future RfA’s proceed better than this one did. Again, I thank you for your support. ≈ The Haunted Angel Review Me! 02:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support
Thanks for your support with respect to my request for adminship, which successfully closed today with a count of 47 support, 1 oppose. If you ever see me doing anything that makes you less than pleased that you supported my request, I hope to hear about it from you. See you around Wikipedia! Accounting4Taste 05:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Help me response
Hi! I deleted the image and posted to the user's talk page. I then noticed from my watchlist that you subsequently posted a reply to the user's userpage at User:Beachpenguin. I've done the same thing myself, not realizing I wasn't at the talk page. I thought you probably didn't realize and would like to know.--Fuhghettaboutit 00:12, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
My RFA | ||
Thanks for participating in my request for adminship, which ended with 56 supports, one oppose, and one neutral. I hope to accomplish beyond what is expected of me and work to help those that lent me their trust. east.718 at 02:34, 11/4/2007 |
Hi, this is a new editor who does mean well but is still learning. Is the page up to snuff now? Benjiboi 10:54, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Layout
Is it just me, or does this layout seem rather familiar?
I don't mind that you use it, but please keep the "Omega Purple Template - Excirial 2007" div i put on the main page in. Thanks in advance! :)
--Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 11:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah - the headers were indeed thieved from you ;-). Original attribution is on my sandbox's history - forgot to include it. I was going to ask you where you wanted a note put in, and have put in a mention on my user page. Cheers, --Pumpmeup 04:30, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia has a new administrator!
GlassCobra's RfA
My RFA | ||
Hey! Just wanted to say thanks for your Futughitryke Support in my request for adminship, which ended with 61 supports, 3 opposes, and 1 neutral. Despite the fact that I have no idea what that means, I appreciate it! Haha. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified, and feel free to look me up anytime for help or opinions! GlassCobra 00:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Awarded to NeilN for beating me on the draw quite a few times & keeping peace on the 'pedia. --Pumpmeup 05:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC) |
- My first Barnstar! Thanks! --NeilN 05:25, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- No worries, all the best :-) --Pumpmeup 05:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for supporting me in my recent RFA which unfortunately did not pass at (47/23/5). I will be sure to improve my editing skills and wait till someone nominates me next time. Have a great day(or night)! --Hdt83 Chat 05:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support.
Template thieving
Yeah - the headers were indeed thieved from you ;-). Original attribution is on my sandbox's history - forgot to include it. I was going to ask you where you wanted a note put in, and have put in a mention on my user page. Cheers, --Pumpmeup 04:30, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Just use the little template thats on my user page, and put it somewhere at the bottom of your user/talk page :) --Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 07:28, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- Just use the little template
Thank You For Helping WikiProject Squirrels!!!
Thank you for helping out Wikipedia:WikiProject Squirrels. If you can, please help WikiProject Squirrels make a stub. Wikipedia is going to delete this template due to that we did not propose it first. Thank you for joining and please help, Creater of WikiProject Squirrels —Preceding comment was added at 18:54, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
"NZ"?
Heh - I didn't realise I was talking with another kiwi. I take it you know about Wikipedia:New Zealand Wikipedians' notice board? Grutness...wha? 09:41, 12 November 2007 (UTC) (in Dunedin)
Fair use rationale for Image:Mintshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mintshot.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 10:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- For the record; the bot didn't notice the rationale right in front of it's face :-) -Pumpmeup 02:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
WP:SCUBA Newsletter Issue #1
|
|
|
|
Speedy deletion of Bliss-stick
A tag has been placed on Bliss-stick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chetblongtalk to me 02:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- For the record, take a look at my ramblings on Talk:Bliss-stick, the company is notable and was kept :-) -Pumpmeup 02:43, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Cough cough
While all votes are appreciated that is twice you've voted for Johnny :) I'll let you fix it? Cheers --Herby talk thyme 08:29, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know - 2nd time this month - duhhh... :-) -Pumpmeup 08:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
French sculptors
I think that "has a work that is exhibited at the Louvre" is an assertion of notability. Please be a bit more careful with speedy deletion nominations for articles on older topics like dead artists; even if the article doesn't look perfect from the start, they are more likely to be encyclopedic than articles on living garage bands. When in doubt, use WP:PROD or WP:AFD. Thank you, Kusma (talk) 10:33, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism study
Pumpmeup, I am interested in joining the vandalism study, and I wanted to know what requirements I must have. Thanks, --Hdgcfcf (talk) 03:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Navigation Template
Where did you learn how to make your template on your user page?
Can you please direct me to where I can learn advanced wiki markup to make such templates?
--Kevin Traver (talk) 21:34, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- You can take a look at the markup around my pages, other than that I'm not too sure. Really it's just experience from copying other people's template designs - just remember that attribution is required. Cheers, Pumpmeup 08:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)