Puppies937
| This is Puppies937's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
DYK for Cedric Wermuth
editHi Puppies937, I have seen you have expanded the article on Cedric more than 5 x, so I nominated it for a DYK. Feel free to have a look and word an other hook. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 11:19, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Cédric Wermuth
edit
On 23 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cédric Wermuth, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Cédric Wermuth, the co-president of the Swiss Social Democrats, was once fined for squatting? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cédric Wermuth. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cédric Wermuth), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Per the discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_46#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews there's a very clear consensus here that Scaruffi is not to be used as a source in music/album articles in any capacity. So please, do not add his opinions anymore. It is a wp:self published source. Since this is a long running dispute, any contributor warned by the situation and who doesn't respect it, would encounter sanctions and could be blocked from editing. Thanks. You've been informed because you used this source here. Woovee (talk) 03:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
September drive bling
edit
|
The Modest Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to Puppies937 for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2022 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 19:17, 6 October 2022 (UTC) |
March 2023
edit
Hello, I'm Dl2000. I noticed that you recently removed content from GX-2 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dl2000 (talk) 00:27, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation of your changes. It looked like some referencing was being removed, but on further review, one of those was a consolidation, but the conversion of the Youtube citation to an external link probably should have been replaced with another, probably more reliable, citation. Anyway, I have generally restored your edits, but flagged areas that could use more footnotes/citations. Dl2000 (talk) 01:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
March GOCE drive
editThanks for all your help. When you record your work, please follow the instructions in the "Totals" section of the drive (or blitz) page; there's no need to add the date an article was tagged. We use a script to generate the barnstar table, and a lot of extraneous stuff takes a while to remove prior to running the script 
. All the best, Miniapolis 18:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
March 2023 GOCE drive awards
edit
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| This barnstar is awarded to Puppies937 for copy edits totaling over 60,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE March 2023 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 03:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC) |
|
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Articles, 1st Place | |
| This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Puppies937 for copyediting 35 articles during the GOCE March 2023 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 03:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC) |
|
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Words, 3rd Place | |
| This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Puppies937 for copyediting 61,914 total words during the GOCE March 2023 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 03:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 2nd Place | |
| This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Puppies937 for copyediting 6 long articles during the GOCE March 2023 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 03:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Old Articles, 4th Place | |
| This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Puppies937 for copyediting 11 old articles during the GOCE March 2023 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 03:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Longest Article, 1st Place | |
| This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Puppies937 for copyediting one of the five longest articles – 21,823 words – during the GOCE March 2023 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 03:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC) |
Deflagration
editHello Puppies937.
I'm new to editing Wikipedia and I saw you made some sort of changes to the edits I made on the deflagration page. When I do the compare, which is not visual, I don't understand what you did. The page reads the same as before (I think). One area I'm confused about is when referencing web pages I don't understand the nuances of "live" vs. "archived." Did you fix an error I made in that regard. Thanks in advance. DoktorScience (talk) 21:05, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi! I just saw your posting on my Talk page. Thank you so much for taking the time to educate me. It was very helpful. I will try to include archived url references as well as live urls from now on.
- Thanks again. DoktorScience (talk) 01:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello again. I made more edits on the deflagration page and once again got a CS1 error. This time it was an "archive-url=is malformed:time stamp. Per this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:CS1_errors:_archive-url I noticed the archive reference requires a 14 character time stamp (YYYYMMDDhhmmss). Once I added that into the url per the format on the CS1 page, the error went away. Eureka! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DoktorScience (talk • contribs) 03:11, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Edits on Turkish language
editI didn't understand your edit. Why are the notes gone? Beshogur (talk) 12:59, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi Beshogur, like I mentioned in my edit summary, the notes are under the "notes" section. I did not delete anything. I was fixing a broken ref and noticed they were getting completely lost in the refs section. Puppies937 (talk) 20:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- I see, but when I click the ^ icon, it doesn't move to the note below. Beshogur (talk) 20:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- I'll take a look at it! Puppies937 (talk)
- hi Beshogur, I think I fixed it. take a look and let me know if you see any additional issues I can fix. Puppies937 (talk) 00:57, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- It's ok, thanks. Beshogur (talk) 11:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Ag Against Hunger for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ag Against Hunger, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ag Against Hunger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHello, Puppies937. Thank you for your work on Adina Verson. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Women in Red
editHi there, Puppies937, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you have recently been so active in creating biographies of women. I hope there will be many more. If you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Primer. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:27, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
edit 
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Louisville Barnstar for you!
edit
|
The Louisville Barnstar | |
| For fulfilling all of WikiProject Louisville's infobox requests for articles related to the Louisville area. Cheers! Stefen Towers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 03:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Starlab, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2024
edit
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Nagaland (disambiguation) for deletion
edit A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nagaland (disambiguation), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagaland (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Eduardo Monteiro
edit Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Eduardo Monteiro, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to join New pages patrol
edit
Hello Puppies937!
- The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2024
edit
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2024
edit
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2024
edit
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Remove all your edits to 27th ENG. Time Now°
1st&ONLY... 2603:9001:D06:3C48:F6E3:BAFC:584D:8AF2 (talk) 02:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- thanks for the vaguely threatening demand for me to reverse an edit I made over a year ago. let me know why you think my edits should be removed and I will consider it. you can also just reverse them yourself but you're going to need a good reason or you will immediately be flagged for vandalism. Puppies937 (talk) 22:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2024
edit
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
edit
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
edit
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
FYI
edit"USA" should not be used in articles unless it is part of a proper name or in certain situations, like sporting entities, per WP:NOTUSA. SounderBruce 05:11, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- SounderBruce - didn't know that, thanks for the heads-up! Puppies937 (talk) 05:17, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Attempted de-orphan articles
editHi Puppies937, For article Augustin Pesnon, I de-orphaned by adding a Pesnon link at List of French people, Musicians section. In addition to "List of ..." articles, a link can sometimes be added to the "See also" section of a relevant article. The Further template is also useful, to add a link, usually at the bottom of a section mentioning the topic. For a long time, I've been de-orphaning Association football biographies by adding the person to yyyy in association football, Births. But that is a bit more complicated as I use the PetScan tool to extract a list of biographies to work on. Hope these ideas are helpful, otherwise all the details are at Suggestions_for_how_to_de-orphan_an_article. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 12:53, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
edit
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Unsourced dates in biographies
editWhere are you getting these birth dates from in edits like Special:Diff/1242064434 and Special:Diff/1242064889? If you've added dates to other biographies, please go back and add citations to reliable sources or remove them. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi NinjaRobotPirate, any dates like that are pulled from whatever is in the article already. In those cases, the year of birth is in the categories tags, added by another editor. I ALWAYS source information when I add to an article, but when adding infoboxes, I just use the information already present. Puppies937 (talk) 11:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- If you add dates to an infobox that you don't source, that's still adding unsourced content to a BLP. Don't do that. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- In this case -- and this is a genuine question -- should I not add infoboxes to pages that are entirely unreferenced? I am just going through the maintenance tag for pages needing infoboxes. I typically then tag a page as unreferenced/blp unreferenced if it is not already tagged but I do add the infobox using the information in the article. Just trying to understand where the line is. Puppies937 (talk) 17:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- The problem isn't with infoboxes, it's unsourced content being replicated. If you add an infobox to an article saying that someone was born in 1960 or whatever, and that's not sourced in the article anywhere, you've added unsourced content to Wikipedia. If it's already sourced in the article body, it doesn't have to be sourced in the lead/infobox also, and there's no need to clutter the infobox or whatever with more citations. It never hurts to have a citation, though.
As to whether any article in particular needs an infobox, there was a whole big Arbcom case about that. Some people got banned from adding/removing infoboxes, and the topic was put under "contentious topics", like BLPs. I personally think BLPs should have infoboxes when there's enough important and well-sourced content to warrant one. If there's only enough content to fill in one parameter (or maybe just two), I usually leave it out. That's just me, though. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- The problem isn't with infoboxes, it's unsourced content being replicated. If you add an infobox to an article saying that someone was born in 1960 or whatever, and that's not sourced in the article anywhere, you've added unsourced content to Wikipedia. If it's already sourced in the article body, it doesn't have to be sourced in the lead/infobox also, and there's no need to clutter the infobox or whatever with more citations. It never hurts to have a citation, though.
- In this case -- and this is a genuine question -- should I not add infoboxes to pages that are entirely unreferenced? I am just going through the maintenance tag for pages needing infoboxes. I typically then tag a page as unreferenced/blp unreferenced if it is not already tagged but I do add the infobox using the information in the article. Just trying to understand where the line is. Puppies937 (talk) 17:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- If you add dates to an infobox that you don't source, that's still adding unsourced content to a BLP. Don't do that. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
September 2024 at Women in Red
edit
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, Puppies937,
Please use Twinkle to tag pages for deletion. Go into your Twinkle Preferences to check off the box that states "Notify the page creator" so that the article creator is notified when you've tagged one of their articles for deletion. You can also check the boxes for all of the CSD criteria if you ever tag pages for speedy deletion. It's important for content creators to receive these notifications. Twinkle makes this easy and will even maintain a deletion log for you. It remembers all of the templates so that you don't need to. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- thank you!! Puppies937 (talk) 19:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Yukio Edano
edit Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Yukio Edano, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:31, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2024
edit
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2024
edit
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)