Purij
Purij, you are invited to the Teahouse!
edit
|
Hi Purij! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:04, 13 July 2017 (UTC) |
July 2017
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Army of Revolutionaries has been reverted.
Your edit here to Army of Revolutionaries was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/THWAR1/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:10, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in People's Protection Units, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JesseRafe (talk) 16:19, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
August 2017
edit
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --John (talk) 19:17, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? Purij (talk) 20:34, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- I'm talking about edits like this. --John (talk) 20:41, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
OK, thanks for letting me know. Purij (talk) 21:28, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
I don't believe it warranted an official warning considering I didn't delete anything or add any bad sources. Purij (talk) 19:59, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Mandatory notice
edit
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.--John (talk) 20:11, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
OK, cool. Purij (talk) 21:28, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Changes in S.L. Benfica
editDo you have a source supporting your edit about Ola John? SLBedit (talk) 18:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Your renaming of a section header to "League and European success" implies that Benfica won the league for the first time during 1950–70 and doesn't specify the European success, when in reality Benfica dominated the league and were back-to-back European champions. SLBedit (talk) 18:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
My bad, I just released I misread the page, though he was loaned out for this season to Deportivo. Purij (talk) 19:14, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Good point. The peer review I was basing edits off is simply too out of date, another one needs to be done. Purij (talk) 19:14, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- I think it was better before. Now, even after a renaming, the previous title doesn't fit because the 50s weren't dominated by Benfica. SLBedit (talk) 19:51, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
To make sure other potential contributors are involved, we should continue this on Benfica's talk page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:S.L._Benfica#Reformatting_the_history_section Purij (talk) 20:17, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit
Hello, Purij. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)