Purplebeaver

Regarding your edit to Stork:

Your recent edit to Stork (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 15:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

You have recently vandalized the Mum article, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior.

Since you have registered an account, I assume you intended to do more than vandalize pages. If this is the case, you're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. For an explanation of what constitutes vandalism, please see this policy; such actions are not taken lightly.

Here are a few links you might find useful:

• Policy on reverting others' changes
• Policies on politeness and wikiquette
• Policy on maintaining a neutral point of view
• Policy for content when editing articles and creating new ones
• Policy on using Wikipedia to advertise

If you want to continue editing here, I hope you will begin to take these policies more seriously. Disruptive editors can be blocked from editing Wikipedia, and nobody wins when that happens. I'm looking forward to seeing your contributions, and if you have any questions, feel free to contact me for help. Kafziel ^Talk 16:07, 18 January 2007 (UTC)