User talk:Pv186/sandbox
Vanessa's Edit
editThe edits I have suggested are mostly grammatical and structural. However, some of them are stylistic choices that Pranay can decide. Almost all of the writing was without bias, except for one part which had already been flagged for review in case of too much personal opinion. Solid additions to the page overall.Vlp5 (talk) 03:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC)vlp5
——————————
Suggested edits
The edits I have suggested are mostly grammatical and for clarifying purposes. For the most part, the writing was neutral. Some of the sentences were long a confusing. Overall, a very informative writing. Allisonsemands (talk) 15:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Allisonsemands
https://docs.google.com/a/georgetown.edu/document/d/15TwLuzAw-EWL_CFIKgYyFPS7pP4hsYzlpwchlL2pZmQ/edit?usp=sharing Allisonsemands (talk) 18:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Allisonsemands
In the Connections to Multicultural Literature subheading I want to include the statement "Bless Me, Ultima-- a coming-of-age novel by Rudolfo Anaya-- should qualify for this definition through Anaya’s take on Chicano culture through the eyes of a boy trying to make sense of the world." Based on Vanessa's edits, I have tried to find sources that could match this statement (an analysis made in the Mini-Research Assignment) and I removed it as I couldn't find any authoritative sources that have the same opinion. This is ultimately good in that I'm not trying to place my opinion in an objective Wikipedia article.
Pv186 (talk) 16:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Pranay Vadapally
NOTE: I had made my Final Draft by direct editing of the First Draft. To accomodate for the error, I pasted my original First Draft prior to the Final Draft
Pv186 (talk) 17:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Pranay Vadapally