Pvujin

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Pvujin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Peter vujin, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011

Hello Pvujin. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Peter vujin, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Autobiography. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:41, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peter Vujin

The article Peter Vujin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person, does not meet WP:BIO. Searches on Google News and Google do not give any coverage in independent reliable sources establishing notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 09:48, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion

You have recently made a number of comments at various Article for deletion discussions which appeal more to emotion than to actual Wikipedia policies. Wikipedia has a number of policies that govern what content should be included; as a new user, you would do well to familiarize yourself with them before diving further into the Articles for deletion area. Deletion decisions are not a vote, but rather a decision of an administrator based on the reasonableness of the points presented as they relate to policy. Littering deletion discussions with statements such as "Female native american poet - a rare bird! Could u give her a chance to improve, please?" doesn't really help the process. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:14, 25 April 2011 (UTC) Dear Sir: my appeal was, I believe, to the 'free encyclopedia' status where I believed free speech and principles of democracy would be welcome. Now you have made me realize that it really appears to be a 'free administration' encyclopedia. As a Canadian-American, how many female native american poets can you name? I'm hard pressed to even think of one. So my point is since you know we live in the most racist, sexist, classist and cleptocratic society governed by the unconstitutional worthless 'green toilet paper' notes, is there really a chance to learn something new if all must be pre-approved by the corrupt media? Case in point - 9/11/2001. Is there a book out there that REALLY questioned what happened then? What journalist would dare to comment on that? Bottom line, I came here to learn something, not to watch Fox Tv. That;s why I firmly believe in our right of free speech, and as a matter of creed I am generally opposed to deleting lesser known articles. That's where we learn the most since its what u can't see anywhere else! Now, I'm sure that's a value we share as Americans or Canadians. At any rate, once I improve my article, I hope that we would see our way clear to more favorable co-operation in the future. Thank you and good nite, yours, Pvujin (talk) 05:20, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Your article was deleted for no other reason than after being given a respite of seven days, it was unable to meet Wikipedia criteria for inclusion. Please note also that Wikipedia is not only edited by North Americans. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:28, 26 April 2011 (UTC)