Quell Quell

Warning

Please be careful about deleting RS-supported material on the basis of IDONTLIKEIT. That's not how WP works. Thank you. 184.153.21.19 (talk) 06:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

The matter is that it's a blatantly objectively false statement. If I didn't like what I read I would've also cancelled the previous statements by israeli and us officials, which would be obviously idiotic as they have enough importance to be encyclopedic. If you're so dead set on keeping that extract than you open the page to become a pissing contest of two factions outdoing each other with pointless statements.

If that excerpt is indeed fine than it's perfectly fine for me to add tens of arguments and counterarguments from the other side, all from even more fastidious people and all yet still having far more relevance than a self proclaimed israeli activist law influencer. Quell Quell (talk) 13:21, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

It may be in your interest to spend some time watching how editing is done at the Project and holding off deleting RS-supported text until you better understand the process, and have had a chance to consider WP's rules. I recognize that you are a new editor. Best. --184.153.21.19 (talk) 06:14, 20 October 2024 (UTC)