Quentin00
Duplicate images uploaded
editThanks for uploading Image:Bostoncombatzone.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Bostoncombatzone.JPG. The copy called Image:Bostoncombatzone.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 15:02, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Boston, Massachusetts, you will be blocked from editing. You have violated the three-revert rule. I will be following up with other editors as to the next course of action. Aepoutre 16:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
What abuse?
editI thought for some reason the changes I was making to the "Boston" article were not "taking hold." Obviously, I was mistaken, as I seem to violated some rule. In any event, please explain why my changes were "wrong" or "unacceptable." The fact that Boston is listed and considered a "world city" (while few other cities are), and the fact that I was moving this sentence to the beginning of the article would indicate to me that this would IMPROVE the article. Let me know what criteria you use to determine this.
- Quentin, please read Wikipedia:Three-revert rule and the comment I made on Boston's talk page for you. HERTZ1888 is probably a kinder and more experienced user than me, however, so I'd like their opinion, regardless. Aepoutre 20:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC)