User talk:RA0808/Archives2011/July
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:RA0808. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Err, watch that bite
Hi there. This edit to User talk:Cheshire electrical decor was uncalled for. Firstly, this was NOT vandalism. Secondly, was there any reason you went straight for the level 4 warning? As far as I can see this was a genuine edit by a new user, made in complete good faith, as per their previous edit. Nikthestoned 11:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Looking at the full diff of my reversion it is a good faith edit, but still unconstructive as he/she was promoting the business in their username.
- I agree that a level 4 warning was uncalled for and I take full responsibility. I should have double checked the warning history while using Huggle, so that was careless on my part (I know "use of an automatic tool" is not an excuse, so I take responsibility). Thanks for drawing my attention to this, I'll go and change the warning to a level 1. Regards, RA0808 talkcontribs 12:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- I agree the username is problematic (hence the coi-username warning), but that doesn't make the users contributions "unconstructive". I do, however, conceed that it should probably have been reworded / removed! Nikthestoned 12:07, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- I have gone and replaced my level 4 warning with a level 1 advert warning, and added a message explaining my rationale. Again, thanks for pointing this out. I'll do my best to be more careful in the future! RA0808 talkcontribs 12:09, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- No worries :) Nikthestoned 13:08, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- I have gone and replaced my level 4 warning with a level 1 advert warning, and added a message explaining my rationale. Again, thanks for pointing this out. I'll do my best to be more careful in the future! RA0808 talkcontribs 12:09, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- I agree the username is problematic (hence the coi-username warning), but that doesn't make the users contributions "unconstructive". I do, however, conceed that it should probably have been reworded / removed! Nikthestoned 12:07, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| For the quick attack revert on User talk:ClueBot Commons. Thanks! Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 13:37, 7 July 2011 (UTC) |
- Thank you! :D RA0808 talkcontribs 13:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
I wanted to let you know I have challenged your WP:CSD A7 on Theodore Schaffer. Subsequent to your tagging of the article it was expanded substantially, and now includes an adequate claim of importance. It still needs some work to comply with the notability guidelines, but it probably can. Monty845 17:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Just letting you know
User:Deneldynamics has returned and has been pasting copyvio in various articles. I have reported the matter to WP:AIV. Roger (talk) 11:14, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up, it looks like the administrators have already dealt with him/her. RA0808 talkcontribs 21:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC)