User talk:RA0808/Archives2011/June

Iroquois Class Destroyer Article

Hi! With regards to the change I made to the Iroquois Class Destroyer page..

I changed the reference to HMCS Huron having been "decommissioned" to having been "paid off" on 31 Mar 07, because Canadian Naval ships (and those of most Commonwealth navies) are not decommissioned. When Canadian ships reach the end of their career, they are paid off and sent for disposal.

This is even reflected in the article on HMCS Huron itself.

Thank you,

ExecutorPrime (talk) 00:32, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

• Alright then, I apologize for reverting your edit RA0808 (talk) 00:33, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

No worries, just thought I would explain why I did what I did. ExecutorPrime (talk) 00:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

Hi RA0808/Archives2011/June. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:15, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

IT is NOT unconstructive for to describe opinion

Happy st patricks day —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.141.181 (talk) 04:22, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm afraid that Wikipedia is a place for facts and not personal opinions, therefore your edit(s) were unconstructive. If you are looking for somewhere to voice your opinion, please go elsewhere on the internet. RA0808 (talk) 04:24, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

OK sory for mixup —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.141.181 (talk) 04:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Alex Chilton

Forgive me, as it was not my intention if I made things worse. You see, I thought that there were duplicate articles created, because for whatever reason, I couldn't move the page back to it's normal name.--F-22 Raptör^{Aces High♠} 04:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

It's perfectly understandable, it's very confusing which edits to revert and which to keep. RA0808 (talk) 04:49, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Black Breath (band)

Hello RA0808. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Black Breath (band), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Signed by an established label, assertion of notability. Consider PROD. Thank you. Ale_Jrb^talk 19:53, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism

Cease threatening users who are making good faith and factually accurate edits with blocks. Continue to do so and you will be blocked from editing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.48.226.38 (talk) 03:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

I find your edits do not fall under the umbrella of good faith, and consist solely of personal opinions. Therefore, your edits are not constructive to Wikipedia. If you feel the need to report me to the administrators for "threatening" you, please feel free, but they will see that I am a well established user with a history of constructive reverts and being a productive member of this project

P.S. Please remember to place new comments at the bottom of a talk page and sign your post with four tildes ("~"s) RA0808 (talk) 03:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ElectroIN_Label (Morozzz22 (talk) 02:44, 11 April 2010 (UTC))

Dear RA0808, tell me how can I add a website address in my page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ElectroIN_Label because I've add the External link chapter and there wrote my website addrees, On this method many pages here exist and I've add normally, but now I dont know why everytime my page have this problems, please, If you will not complicate, help me to To finish my page normally.

Thanks:)

Best regards, Levon Atayan

Well Levon, the problem is that your link is a MySpace link, which are generally avoided on Wikipedia, as noted in the Wikipedia external link guidelines. However I have to ask, do you work for ElectroIN Label? RA0808 (talk) 03:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Dear RA0808, I didnt find the page how can I reply on your message that's why I open a new talk section.

I not so understand in the wikipedia codes and I create an information about label as I can. If you can help me, to modify page as it is necessary I'll be grateful:)

About Myspace link, I find now in labels lists, near the name of my label the other labels name, where are many myspace links (for ::example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_Honey_(label))

And about the "ElectroIN Label", I'm the owner of this label:)

Thanks a lot.

Best regards,

Levon Atayan

--Morozzz22 (talk) 10:22, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

What I meant is that MySpace links are not banned, but that they are discouraged in most articles. Articles involving musicians or actors ca be exceptions. In your case however, I think that the links are being removed due to Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines and this is specified in the previous link I gave you to the external link guidelines, since you own the record label putting link's to your label's MySpace is considered "self promotion" under Wikipedia's rules.

The reson why Electric Honey (label) has MySpace links is because they were not added by people connected to the project. Additionally, the reason why the electric honey article exists is because it meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies and organizations, specifically that "No organization is considered notable except to the extent that independent sources demonstrate that it has been noticed by people outside of the organization" as you can see, they have several independent sources that cover their article. RA0808 (talk) 15:40, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Dear RA0808, Thank you for your message, ok, I understand, Let there will be no link on label's page, but it is possible to make so that the page functioned normally? Because now there are no link, but the page is in delete problem.

P.S. And in general I know many people which firms added here by them, but they dont say that they are connected with this company, I though have told fairly :)

Thank you again:)

--81.16.3.104 (talk) 23:10, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm assuming this is you again Levon. Please log in to respond to talk messages to avoid confusion next time.

To preserve your page, you need to find specific references to your label in independent sources, as stated in the notability guidelines for companies and organizations as I quoted above, "No organization [or corporation] is considered notable except to the extent that independent sources demonstrate that it has been noticed by people outside of the organization. If you can find independent sources that reference ElectroIN Label, then the article can be preserved by adding references to these independent sources and fulfilling the notability guidelines. If not, then I'm sorry but there's nothing else to do so the article will be deleted. RA0808 (talk) 02:30, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Was that oatmeal chocolate chip?

Tommy2010 has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

My favorite! Tommy (msg) 03:35, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I certainly hope it was, they're my favourite too! RA0808 (talk) 03:36, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Awesome revert!

Thanks for fixing Triangle to the proper revision. Keep up the good work. :D --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 02:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

No problem, all in a day's work for Recent Changes Patrol. :P RA0808 (talk) 02:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

RE:Pusa Polytechnique

Dear sir, you left a reply on my talk page in which you welcomed me to Wikipedia and also stated that the changes I made to pusa polechnique has been reverted.I would like to mention that I have not made any changes to that page and have never seen that page before.[[1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.177.10.42 (talk) 16:37, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Apologies for my late reply. In response to your message, while you may not have edited the page someone with your IP address did make a nonconstructive edit to Pusa Polytechnic. Depending on the way your Internet Service Provider assigns these addresses, said person may not be you or even a user of your computer, the address could be assigned simply on a user-by-user basis. I hope this helps, and enjoy your time on Wikipedia. RA0808 (talk) 03:33, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: Seabury-Western Theological Seminary

Our firm is helping SeaburyWestern Theological Seminary with its technology and the client asked me to update their page. Seabury is alive, well, financially healthy and graduating students (it helps to be able to sell buildings and get alot of money in return). This old entry says otherwise. What is the protocol to get this text edited so that it is correct and so that it sticks?

Thanks!

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.192.90.132 (talk) 19:43, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Mr. Moran,

I reverted your edit to the page because they are exactly the same as the text on Seabury's website. You are, of course, welcome to contribute to the page but you should closely read the Conflict of Interest Guidelines as your firm is contracted to the subject of the article. Additionally, you may want to read the help article about editing articles.

Please remember that Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or showcasing, so if your do choose to contribute absolutely ensure that your articles are written in a neutral point of view

For now, I have marked the article as outdated and in need of editing. I suggest that you update the article regarding the status of Seabury (Were some/all buildings acquired by Northwestern U.? Why did it stop accepting students in 2008?) as I'm sure you're more familiar with it than I am. After reading the guidelines I suggested above, then you could work at adding other sections to the article.

P.S. Please remember to sign posts on talk pages with four tildes ("~~~~") RA0808 (talk) 20:50, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

Dabomb87 (talk) 17:19, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

warning

Blindly reverting an IP without actually looking at the edit is massively unconstructive. I can't be bothered to look through your other recent reverts, but be more careful in the future. → ROUX ₪ 00:33, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

I realize now, on closer inspection, that the use in the sentence was meant to be "genital". I must say that it did, at the time, look like the type of IP vandalism which I find to be incredibly common on Wikipedia, the replacement of single words with "inappropriate" words and explaining them in the edit summary as "fixing typos". That said, thank you for drawing my attention to this error, and you will find that if you had looked at my other recent reverts that I make many constructive vandalism reverts to Wikipedia. Regards, RA0808 (talk) 03:01, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Re: Minetest-c55

And why? What is the problem? --Kirov Airship (talk) 00:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion templates cannot be removed by the user that created them, only by a registered editor who is not the creator. If you contest the deletion, state your reasons on the article talk page and let the administrators decide. Regards, RA0808 (talk) 00:16, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Can I ask why it was added? I was almost going to sleep. It wold be deleted for no reason. --Kirov Airship (talk) 00:20, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Why you are keeping adding it? --Kirov Airship (talk) 00:24, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

The speedy deletion template was added because the subject of your article shows no indication of importance. Your article was marked so by another editor, Doomgaze, so you will have to ask him why they found your article to meet the speedy deletion criteria.

I am re-adding the notice because it is against the rules for you (the article's creator) to remove the templates, as I mentioned in my first response. Regards, RA0808 (talk) 00:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Biting (cookies)

43?9enter has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

--43?9enter ^☭msg_☭contribs 01:57, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Re: Oak Ridge High School (Orlando, Florida)

Hello,

I had a revision to the page for Oak Ridge High School removed because I erroneously removed cited information from the article; however, the information cited is from 2005 and immediately paints the school in a negative light. From my understanding Wikipedia expects unbiased, neutral entries, and I find it disheartening for a high school's first paragraph in an "encyclopedia" to read "The school has been rated as a D or F institution by the state since 2000" without elaboration on the rating or citing information concerning the rating and the school's efforts to increase it.

While the information is accurate, comparable schools in the same county do not have the same grading information listed on their pages in the same manner, though it is just as widely available as the information cited for this school, which is obviously unfair.

A better option is for the information to be placed elsewhere on the page, away from the introduction which will render the tone of the article neutral, as Wikipedia and those who use the service expect. I'm sure the students of this school would greatly appreciate their learning environment captured in a kinder manner online.

Please assist,

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.205.10.169 (talk) 00:17, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Please realize that I only reverted your edit because you did not cite a reason for removing the statements from the article. Additionally, the removal of said content would be violating Wikipedia's policy of neutrality as you would be removing information from a reliable outside source.

If you feel the information should be moved to another section of the article, then please feel free to do so! Editing on Wikipedia is open to all.

Thank you and enjoy your time on Wikipedia! RA0808 (talk) 21:51, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

P.S. Don't forget to sign your talk page posts with four tildes ("~~~~")

Re: Kaleigh Kennedy (PROD removal)

I noticed you removed my prod from Kaleigh Kennedy with an edit summary of "correcting some typos". Was that intentional? (obviously your allowed to, just checking in light of the edit summary) Monty₈₄₅ 19:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry about that! I didn't mean to remove it, I was fixing some annoying typos. Feel free to restore the PROD. RA0808 (talk) 19:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Re: Easter Sunday Hangover

Dear RA0808 do not attempt to delete my page. The artist is very notable and if you delete it your showing that you want to vandalize society of art, expression and freedom. I would advise not to be biased and respects punks and especially homelesses. Sincerely with love KurtTheHomeless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KurtTheHomeless (talk • contribs) 01:51, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Your article was nominated for deletion because it meets the Criteria for Speedy Deletion, not because I hold a "bias" towards punks and the homeless. Your article fails to establish the notability for the subject, and as such it can be deleted under criteria A7 of the Criteria for Speedy Deletion. I am simply following Wikipedia's basic policies, and I suggest you do the same.

Additionally, calling/implying that other Wikipedia editors are racists or Nazis will not help your case for creating an article. I suggest that you adopt a less militant attitude. Regards, RA0808 (talk) 02:07, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I am not a fan of putting in own space because then the public will have a less likely chance of discovering this art and may turn to something that's significantly less authentic (i.e. Lady Gaga, Justin Bieber) Wikipedia should also exist for discovery. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KurtTheHomeless (talk • contribs) 02:26, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

re: delicious cookies

ScottSteiner has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks for the cookies, always glad to help out! ScottSteiner ✍ 02:19, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Vaporising the vandal. --43?9enter ☭msg☭contribs 05:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Copied to my rather sad little barnstar page. RA0808 (talk) 05:55, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Using Special:MyPage will only display your barnstars if you are the one clicking it. If I were to click it, it would redirect to User:43?9enter/Barnstars, which, in my case, is nonexistent. I have changed it to {{BASEPAGENAME}} (or whatever it is) so that everyone can access that barnstar page. (coughishouldhaveabarnstarforfixingthatuserboxwithoutanyoneaskingmecough) --43?9enter ^☭msg_★contribs 01:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you --43?9enter ^☭msg_★contribs 04:50, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Armbrust has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. †

WikiCookie

Thank you for your recent contributions, or more specifically, your revert-ions (?) of vandalism. -Andy4789 (talk) 22:28, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Re: User:Spencerchris58

Hello - I received a message from you about vandalizing a page User:Spencerchris58. This was a sandbox page that was intended to be deleted and was not. I promise I am not vandalizing anything. Sorry for the confusion.

David —Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidBrowner (talk • contribs) 21:11, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

I'll take your word for it. To avoid confusion like this in the future, please use the edit summary to explain why you are blanking the page. RA0808 (talk) 21:14, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks - I apologize for not putting a comment about the edit. I asked Chris to delete it and he is going to login and do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidBrowner (talk • contribs) 21:19, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

RE: Adams abuse

Well know as sucky your da in Sinn Fein circle —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.97.237.132 (talk) 22:11, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

That may be so, but adding that to the article was not maintain the proper encyclopedic tone that is required in Wikipedia articles. Regards, RA0808 (talk) 22:18, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Re:Urmia

i removed a name "ali najafi" which is not a notable people and it's the name of the editor,he has added his own name to the page,i demand you to report him as an abuser. regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamyarg (talk • contribs) 22:00, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

The user who added Ali Nafaji to the article has not done any further actions that would be cause for reporting. If this continues, then action may be taken. Thank you for your concern, RA0808 (talk) 22:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Re: Democracy

In today's world, RA0808, democratic systems truly leave poor peoples unattended, while capitalism allows for the rich to get richer, and the poor are actually stopped from making material progress, if they are not thrown back down from the ladder of social layers. This is why I edited the article to make it reflect just little bit better the reality with are diving in these days... So, what is your response to that, and why do you remain anonymous, RA0808? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.224.229.220 (talk) 23:08, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

While I admit that I am no expert on political systems, Wikipedia is not a soapbox for airing your views on democracy. Articles must be balanced and maintain a neutral point of view on all topics, especially those concerning politics or current events.

Also, I wouldn't call myself anonymous. One look at my userpage tells you: where I'm from, my personal views, my favourite anime and videogames, and even my sexual orientation. Thank your for airing your concerns, but I suggest that you take your personal views elsewhere. Regards, RA0808 (talk) 23:30, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

User:400 not out

Hey, i just had an edit conflict with you about reporting that user, thanks for the help. :-) Kante4 (talk) 23:49, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi RA0808! Thanks for your help in reverting the vandalism on my user talk page. Enjoy the cookie! Singularity42 (talk) 15:24, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

.

UBX

*Sigh* At the request of User:Σ, instead of just changing it myself, I'll suggest it. If you change {{User:UBX/boyfriendwish}} to {{User:UBX/boyfriendwish|he}} it will refer to you as "he" instead of "they". CTJF83 06:06, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the cookie!!! It is appreciated! Ya, I saw the gay male one, so I figured it wouldn't be a big deal to change the other, but since that other user made it a big deal, I decided to revert myself and post on your talk page. CTJF83 22:07, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Re: London, Ohio

I apologize if you found my edit inappropriate. I am originally from London and my mother volunteers there with the orphanage. She is very proud of their new facilities and i thought i would surprise her by putting them up on Wikipedia. If you would me to reword my edit somehow i would be glad to. Thank you for your time and for ensuring people don’t vandalize my hometowns page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.192.0.4 (talk) 22:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for drawing my attention to this, I see now that your edit was constructive. I hope you'll excuse me, but it seemed at the time a rather suspicious looking edit. Another user has already restored it to the article.

Thank you for drawing attention to this error I made, RA0808 ^talk_contribs 20:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: List of Suite PreCure episodes

thanks for sticking your nose in but Farix started it when I got some titles from off the track sources. I do not read Japanese so I have to rely on people who do and so far they've been 80-90% on the mark. I've been the only one adding things to this list for months now...I've seen other lists that do exactly whAt I'm doing with ongoing series. I'm willing to discuss it with him but only if he leaves my work alone which he is not willing to do. Darkcat1 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC).

Look DarkCat1, I'll be honest with you. TheFarix behaviour is correct in this situation, and it is you who is being disruptive.

Allow me to explain, here on Wikipedia we have policies regarding the reliability of sources (for example this one which states (and I quote) "because the encyclopedia portion [of Anime News Network] is user-edited, that information is not reliable by Wikipedia standards". Additionally the Wikipedia verifiability policy states that "threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth...material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, [and is] not whether editors think it is true." and I'm afraid that fansubs are not considered a reliable source. The "other articles" that you mentioned are most likely using reliable sources and if they are not will soon be corrected.

Now on to the larger problem, you have now begun to edit war with TheFarix over this page and I highly reccomend you stop know and attempt to establish a consensus. I will go to the page and "comment out" the addition you made (meaning that it is still there as you left it but just made invisible) and you should ask TheFarix to have a calm discussion with you. Once you have reached a consensus, you can act upon it.

Please note that continuing to edit war is a violation of Wikipedia policies and will lead to a permanent block. Regards, RA0808 (talk) 03:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

He's already reverted again, which I've field a Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring notice on. —Farix (t | c) 03:12, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Damn, and I went through all that trouble to be polite and explain the rules. RA0808 (talk) 03:22, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks the the award. Unfortunately, I have to deal with such people far too often. —Farix (t | c) 10:43, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

he gets an award and I get banned. No justice. I'm sorry but to be fair both sides of a dispute must be treated equally thank you. Also I checked TV ashi which through a bad Google translation confirms my titles. to me your definition of "verifiable" on wikipedia is a joke. Wikipedia is a collection of useless trivia penned by millions of users based on off the beat info by it's very definition. I'm sorry I'm still angry and I will keep apologizing but my info is sport on. I'm sorry it doesn't meet your standards Darkcat1 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:05, 8 June 2011 (UTC).

You were blocked (not banned) for edit warring (not waiting to achieve consensus and violating the three revert rule) and making personal attacks against another editor (I don't think that calling someone an "idiotic wiki nazi" is anything but a personal attack, and I felt he deserved the award for maintaining a civil attitude after such a blatant attack). I would definitely say that breaking some of the core policies of this project is grounds for a short block.

Additionally, I'm sorry that you disagree with Wikipedia's verifiability policies but it is one of the core content policies. These policies are in place to PREVENT Wikipedia from becoming "a collection of useless trivia penned by millions of users based on off the beat info" (as you said). If you disagree with the core policies of Wikipedia, then may I remind you that Wikipedia is not compulsory and you are free to leave at any time. Regards, RA0808 ^talk_contribs 21:00, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

I don't disagree but I do disagree with Farix for not helping me at all ad spelling out what sources he will accept(the "my way or the highway" idiocy). I'm sorry I get mad sometimes(i'm very sorry for any personal attacks because this was wrong.) and I can't read Japanese so I rely on secondary translation sources like fans and fansubbers that probably came from Toei's(they make Suite Precure) website originally or perhaps a Japanese TV schedule. Also your FAQs are so full of double talk I can't understand them at all....The only help I got was: Point at long winded and unintelligible FAQs and by the way you're doing it again. I tried to read those but they just made my head spin. Wikipedia should be about people helping people with things they are not sure of no "It's not my problem so I'll delete you correct info because it's not my job to help you find the right source which equals delete instead of "oh this looks good so I should help out the poor fellow but soucing it and actually add something"". It should be your job to help...not delete things because you don't understand them. I've already proved that I'm correct on one of the two disputed titles by using the website of the TV network that airs the show in Japan...although Google translate is 100% bad..I'm sure the second title is correct by Toei animation as well but I have no way of proving this without a Japanese translator which I really request if you have one. At the very least the title for 19 will be proven correct by the preview of 18 winch airs in 1-2 days in Japan and be posted on the TV network's website. This goes back to my main problem with Farix's policy: Because the episode has not aired we can't know the title. This is 100% wong when it comes to any TV show as producers often map out episode titles during production and in the case of anime they are announced at the very least one episode in advance for the title at least(previews must not be used for episode summaries but are fine for getting the title of the next episode)...and maybe more if they are posted to the maker's website. Darkcat1 (talk) 02:11, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: WGMU-CA

why when I correct incorrect false information about a business I own do you revert back to the false information?

I do not understand how you can insist false information be retained. part of it is slanderous as well.

this makes zero sense so I would appreciate a response as to why I cannot correct information that is false and or incorrect? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cecholdings (talk • contribs) 20:49, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Your edits were reverted because there was a large amount of content removed with no reason given in the edit summary. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 20:53, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

my edits of WGMU

We own WGMU and object to your consistent changes to reflect incorrect and false information.

I will take legal action if this persists.

Comments are one thing. Materially false descriptions and or information will not be tolerated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cecholdings (talk • contribs) 21:21, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

RA0808 does not need to answer this as it appears you are subject to WP:CONFLICT of interest, which is strongly discouraged. You should instead provide independant sources for any claims you make. Nasnema  Chat  21:31, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Worried? Me?

The deletion was due to an almost verbatim repetition of the previous sentence. I think this is unprofessional so used my multi-year experience editing content to take an executive decision to improve an entry about my employer. Nuff said? Czyrko (talk) 12:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm confused. I don't understand what article or section you are referring to and how I am involved. Could you please tell me which article you are referring to exactly? RA0808 ^talk_contribs 13:00, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: John Nelson

problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.190.0.160 (talk) 21:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Can't tell if amateurishly trolling, or just a standard wiki-vandal. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 21:18, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Why u not let me edit this geezer's page? is it cos u is a gay male? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.190.0.160 (talk) 21:20, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Obvious vandal is obvious, your edits are blatant vandalism. Therefore, they were removed. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 21:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

WHAT ABOUT JOSH'S FATHER?

HE DIED IN APLANE CRASH DOESNT THE MEAN INYTHING TO YOU?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.174.148.15 (talk) 13:47, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Wow you sure deal with some shit. This talk page is fucking nuts. Objection withdrawn. 184.174.148.15 (talk) 13:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

LOL

Good work with fixing the POV stuff (and thanks for my morning laugh with [2] - amazing what creeps into articles!) Orderinchaos 01:19, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I do what I can. :D RA0808 ^talk_contribs 01:20, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: Barts and the London RFC

I made updates to include new captain, victories this year and myself as chairman. If doubts please refer to blrugby.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomschance (talk • contribs) 15:31, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your intervention

on my talk page—I appreciate it. --Old Moonraker (talk) 21:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: Articles of Confederation

RA0808, the edit you reverted 10 days ago was actually a cleanup. Section "Ratification" stood twice, the second time slightly longer than the first time (obviously a rewrite that mistakenly duplicated the text). I just deleted the shorter version again. Arthur (talk) 01:10, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for drawing my attention to this error. I do make mistakes, and it's important for people to point them out when I make them. Sorry for any confusion/bad edits I might have caused! RA0808 ^talk_contribs 01:43, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome :-) Arthur (talk) 01:49, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Love the edit war with yourself! Arthur (talk) 01:54, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Shhh, or my other evil self might come and revert your edit >.> RA0808 ^talk_contribs 01:55, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of The Milner Schools for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Milner Schools is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Milner Schools until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JRPG (talk) 21:01, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Invititation to Motto of the day

Hi there, RA0808! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottoes. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottoes there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By --The Σ ^talk_contribs 02:52, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

RE Rory McIlroy

It seems that everytime I try to edit Rory McIlroys Nationality to Irish and add his partners name...It gets reverted.

Why?

Wiki is suppossed to be a reliable source of information, and people like me who try and make a decent contribution, only to have it get reverted back is irratating.

Rory McIlroy is IRISH, and on his Wiki "Profile" it says Northern Ireland, which isn't even a nationality; It's a place! Why should wiki be allowed to misinform?

His partner is Called Holly Sweeney; I put that there too as a contribution, and that he has NO children. But i'll just leave my contributions to wiki to myself since they don't mind giving misinformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chipkin9 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Chipkin9, I have no feelings in either direction of this dispute. I reverted your most recent edit because (and only because) you changed his nationality to read "Wiki is a ridiculous source of information, Rory Mcilroy is IRISH, yet when you try and edit it from "Northern Ireland" which ISN'T even a nationality, but a place, then it get reverted back to Northern Ireland. His partner is Called Holly Sweeney; I put that there too as a contribution, but i'll just leave wiki to it since they don't mind giving misinformation". You are going against Wikipedia's policy of consensus as there had already been a discussion on how his nationality is to be described on the talk page, if you disagree then you are free to say so on the talk page.

Additionally, you need to provide a citation for his partner and/or children as per Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources. Hope this helps! RA0808 ^talk_contribs 17:32, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

why the warning about the pentagram map edit?

Dear RA0808,

Today, after spending about 12 hours editing the pentagram map wiki, I discovered to my surprise that I was issued several warnings about vandalizing the page. I would like to try to clear myself of those accusations, and explain the situation.

I am the originator of the pentagram map, having introduced it in a published 1992 mathematics article. Since that time, over the past 19 years, I have written several articles about it. There is a small community of mathematicians who are interested in this mathematical object, and I am in close contact with most of them.

Prior to my edits, my collaborators and I found the wiki page to be both sketchy and inaccurate. Indeed, at the top of the page there was a comment to the effect that the page needed cleaning up. My collaborators and I all agreed that an authority needed to clean up the article. I decided to do this today.

Every one of the edits I made is supported by references to the published mathematics articles that are listed in the reference section at the bottom of the page. I did remove some information from the page that existed prior to my edits, but this information was essentially irrelevant to the topic and out of place on the page.

I am not sure if I am still under suspicion of vandalism, but I would like to clear my name, so that in the future I can still edit wikipedia pages. I love wikipedia and I agree entirely with what seems to be its central mission of disseminating accurate, useful, and well-referenced information. I was editing the pentagram map page today entirely in that spirit.

Best Wishes, RichardEvanSchwartz Chancellor's Professor of Mathematics Brown University http://www.math,brown.edu RichardEvanSchwartz (talk) 02:57, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Mr. Schwartz,

Thank you for drawing my attention to this error. After closer examination it does seem that I and several other editors perhaps reacted too quickly in dismissing your edits as vandalism. I apologize for this confusion, as you were only working to improve the article, and hope that this has not ruined your perception of Wikipedia editors and the project as a whole.

You, as I have seen already, have removed theses erroneous messages from your page and you can rest assured that you may continue to edit and improve Wikipedia without further disruption.

Once again, I apologize for this error. Regards, RA0808 ^talk_contribs 18:49, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Dear RA0808,

Thanks for the apology. I have to say that my experience with wikipedia editors has been almost uniformly bad. Today another editor, Asher186, hastily removed some pictures I had created and uploaded, because I had not licensed them properly. Rather than warn me, Asher168 simply eliminated the pictures, causing me (an inexperienced wiki writer) to waste a fair amount of time fighting to get them restored.

I wish that the wiki administrators, or other people who take it upon themselves to police the system, would show some restraint and discernment, especially when dealing with an article in a specialized field.

If I didn't really love wikipedia and think it was one of the greatest resources on the internet, I probably would just leave in disgust. As it is, I'll keep going and try to improve my editing style and skills so that they don't set off alarms.

RichardEvanSchwartz (talk) 19:12, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry my image removal was so traumatic for you. All you had to do was add a license to your images and re-add them the article, which you did, and within an hour of my removing them. Don't feel picked on. I was patrolling the newly uploaded images and removing unlicensed images from articles.--Asher196 (talk) 21:23, 26 June 2011 (UTC)