RATLAM

$e^{i\pi \ }$This user is a mathematician.

This user is a physicist.

Welcome!

Hello, RATLAM, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Moi Lasu :) Pitke (talk) 11:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Edit to Empirical distribution function

Thank you for your edit to Empirical distribution function in which you add the citation, Madsen, H.O., Krenk, S., Lind, S.C. (2006) Methods of Structural Safety. Dover Publications. p. 148-149. ISBN 0486445976. The referenced sentence begins "However, in some textbooks …". If the reference you have added is not a textbook (is it?) would you fix the sentence and/or reference so that they are consistent? Leegrc (talk) 12:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

It is a widely used texbook with 416 pages alltogether. The book has more than 2500 citations in Google Scholar.RATLAM (talk) 14:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

I did not know whether it was a textbook … thank you for confirming! Leegrc (talk) 12:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bin analysis for random samples from uniform distribution. Weibull vs. Jenkinson.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Bin analysis for random samples from uniform distribution. Weibull vs. Jenkinson.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:50 000 new random observations taken from a uniform distribution falling into three bins.jpg

The file File:50 000 new random observations taken from a uniform distribution falling into three bins.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 4 April 2020 (UTC)