RDiependaele

Michael Beil moved to draftspace

Latest comment: 9 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Thanks for your contributions to Michael Beil. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because as an editor with a disclosed conflict of interest, you are expected to submit this article through the WP:AFC process rather than creating it in mainspace yourself. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have now submitted the article for review. I believe the article is well referenced, I hope it gets published as soon as possible. RDiependaele (talk) 21:04, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi again,

My article was rejected, it seems, but I really don't understand why. I'm quite sure that everything in it is referenced, many elements come from multiple sources. If I've missed anything, I'd be very happy if someone would be willing to point out exactly what is the problem. I've spent many hours on compiling all the information and bringing it together in a legible text, so I'd really like to see the article published at some point :) RDiependaele (talk) 20:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Beil (September 23)

Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't appear to meet WP:NCOMPOSER.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Beil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, RDiependaele! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic