RH597

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RH597 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet account of Bt8257. I have not committed the violations that Bt8257 did. I have not used any IPs to edit on Wikipedia because I do not want to break the rules like Bt8257 did. (I've looked at the investigation page if anyone cares). Just because I have edited the same pages as that account doesn't mean I've abused that account. I only wanted to edit Wikipedia without any trouble. I have some questions for AuburnPilot: If two people walk and talk the same way, does that mean they're the same person? If two accounts edit the same pages, does that mean one's a sockpuppet of the other account? Also, here's a hint: get some actual evidence of me abusing an account instead of just blocking my account without any proof next time.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sock of User:Bt8257. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 03:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No way you pass the duck test. The SPI will determine the truth.ChakaKong^talk 22:54, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

I'm not ducking anything, thank you.

Say hello to Paul Buxton for me, Nick. Ask him about his autograph collection. Go Zags! ChakaKong^talk 20:41, 2 October 2012 (UTC)