RMRicondo

Nomination of GhSMART & Company, Inc. and Geoff Smart for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GhSMART & Company, Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GhSMART & Company, Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:58, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

As a guide to more acceptable writing let me suggest:

Though awards can show notability , they should not be overemphasized in the article. We also refer to people after the initial mention by their last namer only, without title like "Professor", and do not prefer to their names in every possible sentence. A good substitute is "he" or, for a company, either "They" or It".

Puffery like "maximizing the leadership ability of company CEOs" and jargon such as "maximize career success", "building companies" , and "core competency" should be avoided. not to mention such PR-talk as "received praise in the autobiography of a prominent client".

Please also see WP:COI. If you are going to write articles for your company or for a client, it does them no good to write in this manner. We tolerate COI editing only when it follows good encyclopedic writing practice. If it sound like a PR piece, it does not belong in an encyclopedia. DGG ( talk ) 04:13, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

I appreciate your comments for improvement herein, as well as the criticisms voiced on the corresponding pages (GhSMART & Company, Inc. & Geoff Smart). While I do believe the documents adhere to Wikipedia standards, I can see why some language is considered puffery. I will do my best to address these concerns and edit the documents accordingly. I invite your comments as I move forward with this process. RMRicondo ( talk ) 15:40, 16 July 2012

Speedy deletion nomination of Geoff Smart

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Geoff Smart, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bgwhite (talk) 07:27, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Kevin Cashman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tito Dutta (talk) 05:30, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Horsager.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nicholance (talk) 16:51, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Rory Vaden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rory Vaden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rory Vaden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. UninvitedCompany 23:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Paul Jankowski (author) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Jankowski (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Jankowski (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. UninvitedCompany 23:30, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Kevin Cashman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Cashman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Cashman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. UninvitedCompany 23:33, 21 December 2018 (UTC)