Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Rabbi Orr Cohen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 21:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

January 2009

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Who is a Jew?. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 21:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Internment. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Chasingsol(talk) 21:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Secular Jewish culture, you will be blocked from editing. ThuranX (talk) 21:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

January 2010

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Criticism of Holocaust denial, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Note: I have moved this to the talk page. Rabbi Orr Cohen (talk) 12:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Your edit to Synagogue was unhelpful. This edit to Criticism of Holocaust denial is considered vandalism. I reverted this edit to Torah as it expressed a strong, unsourced and unsourceable POV. You received warnings for vandalism this time last year. You need to stop, or you will be indefinitely blocked as a vandal-only account. Please review the five pillars of Wikipedia, and refrain from engaging in the editing behaviour you have displayed both recently and last year. Throwaway85 (talk) 13:39, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Images and BLP

edit

While you may have received permission from the two gentlemen in the image, there are three people in it, and in the absence of evidence of permission there are personality inherent in identifying them as sex tourists. I have removed this image again in accordance with the biographies of living persons policy, and it must not be restored before consensus is reached that it does not represent a BLP issue. I will raise the matter at the administrators' noticeboard and provide you a link after I have done so. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:52, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The question has been raised here. You are welcome to provide input there. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit

Having reviewed all your contributions, I am convinced that your intention on wikipedia is only to disrupt and vandalise. I have therefor blocked this account. As for the image, whilst we try to assume good faith here, in light of your other uploads it is not possible to do that here. I think the probability is that you have uploaded this mischevously, and without regard to the consequences for its subjects.

That is not something we can risk on Wikipedia.

If you wish to contest this block, please explain your previous edits - and why your intention is not continue to disrupt and vandalise.--Scott Mac (Doc) 13:45, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

It is of my opinion that if you add the {{unblock}} template, it should be denied immediately. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 15:32, 30 January 2010 (UTC)Reply