Rabbitjay

June 2020

Hello, I'm Meszzy2. I noticed that you recently removed content from St. Joseph's School, Darjeeling without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Meszzy² (talk) 08:38, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to St. Joseph's School, Darjeeling, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Meszzy² (talk) 08:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Rabbitjay. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page St. Joseph's School, Darjeeling, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Meszzy² (talk) 08:42, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Rabbitjay, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rabbitjay! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Request for unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rabbitjay (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I always tried to improve it unfair for blocking for life Rabbitjay (talk) 18:13, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are socking. Appeal from your main account. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 12:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What block message do you see? I do not see a block on this account. PhilKnight (talk) 18:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

In expiry ... it’s written no expire set on my IP address Rabbitjay (talk) 02:42, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Can't you just edit logged in? PhilKnight (talk) 09:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)