RadSpoon
Welcome!
editHello, RadSpoon, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 09:52, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Peer Review 4/25
editGood morning! Because of formatting, I'm not entirely sure where all of the additions listed in your sandbox are going to end up in the final article, or in what order. I'll take my questions one by one:
- I don't quite understand the phrase "across segments" in the section Practice of music. It might be a good place for a link to another Wikipedia article, perhaps on segments in this context. Besides that, I believe the sentence is a solid addition to the article.
- Why is "Phonological loop" written as a bullet point in the sandbox? Also, you should write out the sentence in plain English, so it would potentially turn into "A phonological loop is a two-part process involving..." As the phrase "Phonological loop" directs one to Baddeley's article in Wikipedia, a link directing a reader in that direction might be beneficial.
- I'm assuming this is an edit under "Digit Span" rather than "Digit Memory Span." You have misspelled "visuospatial," which is of course an easy fix. Additionally, you are missing a period at the end of this section. I'm not entirely sure where your addition will be added within the section, but I can see it as an added little paragraph beneath the two already present.
- The most difficult part about adding a new section is deciding which place in the article to add it. I recommend adding it between Digit Span and Factors, but that's a decision for you to make.
Overall, I think your sources are strong and your stance is neutral. Definitely consider adding more to some of the sections you've got presently, especially for "Memory span in signed languages." It needs some meat to it if you're going to justify making an entirely new header for it. Keep up the good work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by L2 Puppis (talk • contribs) 13:20, 25 April 2017 (UTC)