November 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Adam9007. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Firearm— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 01:26, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Firearm. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Firearm was changed by RagingMatrix57 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882091 on 2016-11-04T01:27:29+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:27, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Reuben Edmund Lee

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Reuben Edmund Lee, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:32, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

LuK3, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it serves only to attack or disparage some entity. Please do not continue to create attack pages, as people who continue to create these pages may be blocked from editing.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. Adam9007 (talk) 01:37, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Stupid Idiots

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Stupid Idiots, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Adam9007 (talk) 01:39, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply