Draft:Transparency: Pardarshita

edit

Hello there! from your contributions, it appears you have an exclusive interest in this draft and one other also related to it. So I was wondering if you might have a conflict of interest with regard to the subject, and thought I'd make you aware of the guidelines in any case. Please give a read to WP:COI if you haven't done already, and make necessary disclosures if you do have a conflict. If you don't have one, you do not need to do anything; making an explicit denial would be helpful though. Sorry to bother you, and kind regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:50, 31 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

August 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm RegentsPark. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Yoni, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 16:18, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

newsgram as a source

edit

Hi. Please note that newsgram is not considered to be a reliable source on Wikipedia. I notice that your addition of newsgram as a source has been reverted by multiple editors. Continuing to add it will be considered disruptive editing so please don't do that. --RegentsPark (comment) 18:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Munish Kumar Raizada (March 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noah 💬 18:30, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, RaiKashish! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noah 💬 18:30, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Munish Kumar Raizada (April 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kashmorwiki was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Kichu🐘 Need any help? 16:44, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Munish Kumar Raizada (May 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 06:48, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Munish Kumar Raizada (May 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:22, 23 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Munish Kumar Raizada (July 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 01:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

WP:COI spamming

edit

[1]

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RaiKashish. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 23:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply