Speedy deletion nomination of Venkataramana narayan raju

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Venkataramana narayan raju requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

{{hangon}} The content is about the life of a person who tried his best to improve the quality of life of people through his dedication to Public Works Projects under difficult circumstances. He was a person whose life story as told in brief in the page can inspire many others to contribute towards Social upliftment and excellence in a chosen field – in this case it relates to Engineering, Education and Helping the poorer sections of society. I have not created any page on Wiki earlier and am not familiar with the rules and conventions – so perhaps you could help me out in retaining this page which could inspire several others to strive for excellence in their lives. I am unsure about how to place a Hangon tag and prevent the deletion of the page, perhaps you could do the needful. Also the following citation can perhaps be of use to strengthen the case for retention http://en.allexperts.com/e/p/pr/prominent_rajus.htmRajendrarajun (talk) 06:50, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your edits in Rajus

edit

Whatever content you have added is not qualified one without any appropriate citation. Rajus WP is for Rajus caste only not ab Brahmins or Bhatrajus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Indianprithvi (talk

The content regarding the two respected Rajus is qualified and appropriate with citation given in the link http://en.allexperts.com/e/p/pr/prominent_rajus.htm, Both are Rajus and they are Somavamshi Rajus (also referred to as Chandravamshi), both achieved high levels of proficiency in their chosen fields They graduated from College of Engineering Guindy and received their B.E. Degrees from Madras University. They contributed to the development of Andhra Pradesh on many projects in their career and to the growth of India -their contribution was recognised and they were rewarded by the Government of India with titles,ranks and medals of Rao Bahadur Puttana Venkataramana Raju and Commander Venkataramana Narayan Raju in the Indian Service of Engineers and Indian Navy respectively. Both were elected Fellows in the Institution of Engineers(India). Their lives are an inspiration to all who knew them. Trust their contributions will be recorded correctly in Wiki, Regards from Rajendra.Rajendrarajun (talk) 06:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC) Reply


Hi Rajendra, You seem to new to wiki. Plz follow wiki guidelines. Ur citation doesnt qualify in category of wiki citation becoz its also similar to wiki. U need to show either books r offical website no other encyclo pages.

http://en.allexperts.com/e/p/pr/prominent_rajus.htm contains som 300 rajus in it. so do u wan to dump all that list in the small table???? Sorry to say that Info box in Rajus is for famous only, not every Raju will be listed in it. Already som famous Rajus names have been removed from it to follow wiki stds. If u still vandal, u wil be banned by Admin.

I suggest In ur wikipage on VN Raju also u need provide reliable citations. say official kshatriya website or som standard book instead of som blog or wikipages.

Cheers 18:31, 7 November 2009 (UTC)


 

Its your last warning. You have been consistently doing miscievous edits without proper knowledge on Rajus. The official Kshatriya website itself clearly shows it doesnt recognize somavanshi kshatriyas as Kshatriya Rajus. Please argua with the Kshatriyas.org (Kshatriya Rajus offcial website) and then discuss. If u still continue your vandals in other wiki pages ADMIN WILL BAN YOU.

THANKS Indianprithvi (talk) 05:00, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Indianprithvi -yes I recently started contributing to wiki and read your most recent comments today, so far you have used the following words in your conversation "not ab Brahmins or Bhatrajus","so do u wan to dump all that list ","consistently doing miscievous edits". Allow me to clarify that neither Brahmins or Bhatrajus communities you mentioned were brought to the site, all that list you mentioned was not put in the site and there were no mischeavous edits- all were genuine efforts to add the facts to the site. However it seems that newcomers to wiki are expected to know all the rules and conventions immediately upon joining to a level equal to people who have been on wiki for longer periods, this may take time for a new contributor to learn and friensdhip and guidance will help rather than the above types of comments ending in a warning. Anyway I will continue in my attempts to contribute to wikipedia - of course while abiding by the conventions and hopefully with helpful guidance from seasoned wiki contributors after collecting more research material to add relevant facts. However a few points you mentioned needs clarification you have stated that"If u still continue your vandals in other wiki pages ADMIN WILL BAN YOU." does this mean that one should not add further reference material? I also would like to understand how you are saying that Somavamshi/Chandravamshi are not recognised - while the site you referred to clearly shows that Chandravamshi is recognised. Surely you are aware that Vamshams of Surya and Soma(Chandra) are both universally recognised? I would like to summarise your actions so far- they were (1)Question whether the 2 were Rajus - once that was resolved (2)Attack their achievements and belittle them - once that was resolved (3)Attack the type of Raju and issue a warning on Wiki. Trust you realise that my posting here is polite and constructive and I expect a polite response too, once again I reiterate that Both are Rajus and they are Somavamshi Rajus (also referred to as Chandravamshi), both achieved high levels of proficiency in their chosen fields They graduated from College of Engineering Guindy and received their B.E. Degrees from Madras University. They contributed to the development of Andhra Pradesh on many projects in their career and to the growth of India -their contribution was recognised and they were rewarded by the Government of India with titles,ranks and medals of Rao Bahadur Puttana Venkataramana Raju and Commander Venkataramana Narayan Raju in the Indian Service of Engineers and Indian Navy respectively. Both were elected Fellows in the Institution of Engineers(India). They were self made men and their lives are an inspiration to all who knew them. Trust their contributions will be recorded correctly in Wiki- Their efforts,contribution in the face of adversity,righteous conduct are to be documented in the story of their lives, which can inspire all of us and future generations all over the world, nothing can change these facts. My Regards to the Wiki community Rajendrarajun (talk) 07:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Rajendraraju, Thanks for ur reponse. At First I was polite. only after ur continued edits without proper citation I had 2 warn as per rules. I respect the TWO Rajus mentioned by u n I personally never undermined or spoke against them. Even ther are lot of other intellectual Rajus whom I like personnally but they cant be put in the small info box. U can check my moderation for Rajus wikipage for past two years. I just follow facts not my personal views. As the list cannot acoomodate all prominent famous Rajus I hav long back created WP List of Rajus U r suggested to the famous Rajus u know to it. Please look upon discussion pages n previous edits of particular wikipages. u will com 2 understand the rules n wiki edit patterns etc.

Thanks Indianprithvi (talk) 08:49, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Puttana Venkatramana Raju

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Puttana Venkatramana Raju requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:25, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

The content is about the life of a person who tried his best to improve the quality of life of people through his dedication to Public Works Projects under difficult circumstances. He was a person whose life story as told in brief in the page can inspire many others to contribute towards Social upliftment and excellence in a chosen field – in this case it relates to Engineering, Education and Helping the poorer sections of society. I have not created any page on Wiki earlier and am not familiar with the rules and conventions – so perhaps you could help me out in retaining this page which could inspire several others to strive for excellence in their lives. I am unsure about how to place a Hangon tag and prevent the deletion of the page, perhaps you could do the needful. Also the following citation can perhaps be of use to strengthen the case for retention http://en.allexperts.com/e/p/pr/prominent_rajus.htmRajendrarajun (talk) 06:51, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Puttana Venkatramana Raju

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Puttana Venkatramana Raju, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 20:38, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Puttana Venkatramana Raju

edit

I have nominated Puttana Venkatramana Raju, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puttana Venkatramana Raju. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 11:48, 28 November 2009 (UTC) Reply

The page was worked upon and external references were added, dates of birth and death were recorded, assertions of notability were added to the first few lines in the lead section, other sites like All Experts which contained details of Puttana Venkataraman Raju were linked and a few helpful editors tried to improve grammar and presentation of the page. With all these changes made, the page would now meet the criterion and I request that the All Expert references be allowed to continue as they clearly show details relating to the honorific Rao Bahadur, and to Hindu High school where Puttana Venkataraman Raju studied initially. Puttana Venkatramana Raju was awarded the Rao Bahadur by the Govt. of India (this is similar to the British Govt. award of OBE) and he was also an elected Fellow of the Institution of Engineers. He contibuted towards Social upliftment and excellence and this page captures relevant aspects of his life. Unfortunately there have twice been removals of the All Experts site links (reason for this deletion was given as "mirror site" but plese note- All Experts is not in anyway connected to Wiki) which refer to the award of the honorific Rao Bahadur, and to Hindu High school where Puttana Venkataraman Raju studied initially.Rajendrarajun (talk) 12:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Puttana Venkatramana Raju (July 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 14:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Rajendrarajun, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 14:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

You can add him to the Rao Bahadur article yourself, if you use the references. DS (talk) 19:56, 12 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Puttana Venkatramana Raju (February 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NotTheFakeJTP was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JTP (talkcontribs) 15:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply