Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajesh Chaudhary Rajesh Chaudhary (July 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 09:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Rajesh Chaudhary Rajesh Chaudhary! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

=

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajesh Chaudhary Politician (July 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:13, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajesh Chaudhary Politician (July 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 17:12, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guddi Devi has been accepted

edit
 
Guddi Devi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:13, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Rajesh Chaudhary Rajesh Chaudhary. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Guddi Devi, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:06, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

July 2021

edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Guddi Devi. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Guddi Devi, you may be blocked from editing. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:45, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Guddi Devi. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 04:37, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:56, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

please STOP editing Guddi Devi

edit

please STOP editing Guddi Devi you have a conflict of interest and should only be requesting edits on the article talk page. Theroadislong (talk) 17:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked indefinitely

edit

I have blocked you indefinitely because despite several warnings and a recent block, you continue to add unsourced content. PhilKnight (talk) 15:48, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply