Ramapoughnative
Ramapoughnative1(->)H0TmaIlcOm thanks!
Barnstar
editTalkback
editExplanation of the policies and guidelines behind my deletion are in my reply to you. Dougweller (talk) 13:44, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits
editHello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
June 2012
editYour recent editing history at Ramapough Mountain Indians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. This shouldn't be necessary as it appears from a post above that you are familiar with what edit warring means. You do need to get a better understanding of what vandalism means and refrain from calling editors vandals because they disagree with you. Dougweller (talk) 07:29, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
NPOV noticeboard
editAs I've posted elsewhere, I've raised the issue of your edit at WP:NPOVN#Are statements for a sources notability POV? where you should be replying. Dougweller (talk) 15:09, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
We are going to work together
editGiven my posts above, I just want to add that Ramapoughnative and I have agreed to work together to improve the article. He's in the best position to do this from the resources point of view, and I hope I can help him with structure, etc to make it more encyclopedic. We are both concerned with the fact that this article deals about real people and has an impact on their lives. Dougweller (talk) 05:51, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- thank you Doug Ramapoughnative (talk) 10:33, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Your article has been moved to AfC space
editHi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Ramapoughnative/Taphance has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Taphance, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 03:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for barnstar
editHi, thanks for the barnstar on RMI. I'm still working on it - with digressions to understand more of the Brotherton Indians of NJ, the Stockbridge-Munsee, and later events. You may be interested in the website: http://brotherton-weekping.tripod.com/ "<Brotherton & Weekping Indian Communities of NJ", which has many primary documents related to the history of the Brotherton of NJ, if you have not yet seen it.Parkwells (talk) 18:13, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, I have seen this site, I have corresponded with Richard Walling about Bethel some time ago and he is very reputable. Ramapoughnative (talk) 04:55, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Senator letter.pdf
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Senator letter.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:02, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Clinton
editHi, I think you made an error at Ben Carson.[1]. Clinton was indeed impeached by the House, but he was not convicted by the Senate. According to the source you cited, "Clinton, the second president in American history to be impeached, vowed to finish his term."Anythingyouwant (talk) 17:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Ramapoughnative. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Ramapoughnative. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Ramapoughnative. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry
editNot on that much right now. I'll try to respond this week. Doug Weller talk 20:58, 15 March 2021 (UTC):WP:RSN#Ramapough Mountain Indians and a report on an oral court argument Doug Weller talk 13:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)