Rasel Faruk

Rasel Faruk, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rasel Faruk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Rasel Faruk. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ariconte (talk) 10:25, 18 August 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Medicine WikiProject!

Welcome to Wikipedia and WikiProject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Medicine (also known as WPMED).

We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of medical articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing Wikipedia articles are:

• Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
• Sourcing of medical and health-related content on Wikipedia is guided by our medical sourcing guidelines, commonly referred to as MEDRS. These guidelines typically require recent secondary sources to support information; their application is further explained here. Primary sources (case studies, case reports, research studies) are rarely used, especially if the primary sources are produced by the organisation or individual who is promoting a claim.
• The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, revert, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss them on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.

Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you have any problems. I wish you all the best on your wiki voyages! — soupvector (talk) 17:11, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Rasel Faruk. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the pages Woolly hair autosomal recessive and User:Rasel_Faruk/Rasel_Faruk, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — soupvector (talk) 17:15, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Personal note of welcome

Dr. Faruk (am I right to address you this way?) - welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your well-intentioned edits. I fear that you might not be fully aware of the rules governing the addition of information to Wikipedia, so I've added the information above to help you get to a constructive start. In general, you should not write anything about yourself, or citing your own publications. If you have a suggestion for an article, you are always welcome to make suggestions on that article's WP:Talk page - so that other, independent editors can consider and perhaps implement the suggestion. There is a large group of editors interested in medical content here if you would like to engage with us collaboratively.

Like you, I am also a physician - you can see more about me on my user page linked via my username here: — soupvector (talk) 17:25, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2009: Using Wikipedia to promote Rasel Faruk

Hello, Rasel Faruk. It has been noticed that you are attempting to promote Rasel Faruk on Wikipedia. When you repeatedly insert an article citation into many Wikipedia articles without improving the article, you are not being a constructive editor. Worse yet, you willfully and repeatedly break the syntax of the References section of these articles, and make no effort to repair it. This is called WP:disruptive editing. Please stop this behavior and confine your efforts to your article creation, where all damage is confined to your article only.

---

Hello, Rasel Faruk. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add {{requestedit}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

--Quisqualis (talk) 23:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for your kind message. I assumed that you simply were not aware of our rules, which are especially strict with regard to medical content and conflict of interest. Please reach out if I can be of assistance, but the readings linked above are an important starting point. — soupvector (talk) 10:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

$850 for an open-access case report

It is understandable that, for $850 paid to be published in an "open access" publication, a person wants to get their money's worth. Feel free to seed your paper around the Web everywhere other than on Wikipedia. Self promoting a case report published for pay is completely inappropriate on Wikipedia. Hair transplant clinic directors aren't generally considered notable.--Quisqualis (talk) 03:32, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Indeed, this edit was a big disappointment. Thanks to Quisqualis for reverting. — soupvector (talk) 04:28, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rasel Faruk/Rasel Faruk

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Rasel Faruk/Rasel Faruk, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Hello, Rasel Faruk. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created  User:Rasel Faruk/Rasel Faruk has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see User:Deepfriedokra/promo for examples of content to avoid. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles. A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE

Wikipedia is not a webhost or LinkedIn --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:25, 30 July 2021 (UTC)