Rashkavar

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:11, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Rashkavar, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 05:51, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

wrong page?

hello you recently made a post to the reliable source notice board _talk_ page. I think you may have wanted to post your question on the notice board itself? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 05:51, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure. The talk page has at least one other example regarding 'general' source policy (the "Assertion vs Silence" discussion), and that's more or less how I intended my question to be interpreted. I supplied background information regarding why I asked my question, but the question itself is "are museum exhibits acceptable sources"? The notice board itself seems to be questioning whether or not a specific source is considered reliable according to policy, not questioning "what is the policy on ____?" type questions. Should questions regarding policy be on the notice board itself or on the talk page? Rashkavar (talk) 07:11, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

you will probably get more responses on the project page itself although they will likely include "what specific content from what specific source" . In my opinion, Museums of national standing that are professionally curated are reliable sources. however, there are a lot of things that pass themselves off as "museums" that are really just tourist traps. The general standard for any source is: does it have a reputation for fact checking and accuracy? (would you trust them to write a biography of someone accused of crimes and not have any hesitation that they would be sued for libel?) -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 07:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Ah. That would explain the lack of a general policy for museums. I'll have to do some extra fact checking, then. Rashkavar (talk) 08:00, 20 November 2012 (UTC)