Rasi2290

dollar figure quote

Look, there are several reasons that line does not belong there (or similar information attached to any other article). First, the information just has no place in an encyclopedia (by this, I mean, there is no valid reason to include it, though I am open to suggestions). Second, it is outdated the moment it is posted. Third, it doesn't take into account the thousands of MBA graduates outside the U.S. (who may have made a lot of money but didn't make a dollar). Fourth, there is no perspective, afterall, that's not a lot of money. If you want to include a statement that "traditionally, MBA graduates earn more than students who have not attained any graduate degree and as a result, many students persue an MBA to increase their earning power," that would be great and it would be beautiful if it were cited. Regardless, please do not add statistics that are meaningless due to lack of context. -James Howard (talk/web) 03:34, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to the Graphic design WikiProject!

Thanks for joining! I looked at your user page, but there's nothing in there about you or your Design background. Where are you located? What kind of work do you do?
– Steveluscher 16:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. —Xezbeth 09:16, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

It's nothing against your site by the way, its just been long established that reviews and suchlike do not belong as external links on individual film pages. —Xezbeth 09:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Not a problem; I understand. But I do think those links serve a purpose and would be within guidelines if I weren't the ones adding them, so I will ask on the discussion pages per above.

Re: We didn't start the fire

hey. The reason I reverted it is because I think it is notable the eisproportionate contributions of the Jews to modern history. There are other ethnic groups listed here to some extent, Soviets, Chinese, etc. I think that we should add other demographic trivia to this article as well. Valley2city 05:08, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Re:wrongly deleted T3E.jpg

Pleasse ask at Wikipedia:Media Copyright Questions. —Pilotguy (ptt) 18:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:T3E.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:T3E.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 17:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of The Third Ending for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Third Ending is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Third Ending until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– DarkGlow • 23:39, 18 August 2021 (UTC)