Raubfreundschaft
Hello there, my talk page doesn't exist yet, so by writing this sentence, I magically turn nothing into something.
See? Magic.
Guten Tag
editWarning
edit
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nanking Massacre denial. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.
In particular the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please note that that it can still be edit warring even when the edits aren't within 24 hours as described at WP:EDITWAR. I suggest you also read WP:OWN as your last edit summary suggests makes it look like you think you own the page. Dpmuk (talk) 00:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- I have no intention to start an edit war, and I have been very vocal on the talkpage of the article in question, perhaps you should take a look first. I don't think I "own" the article, on the contrary, I am telling that to two editors who have acted there like it is them (PCPP at least) who think they own it, and therefore do not feel any need to discuss their changes further. And if refusing to collaborate is a block reason, I think you should tell that to PCPP, not me. Thank you. --Raubfreundschaft (talk) 16:46, 18 January 2011 (UTC)