User talk:Raul654/Wikipedia the Movie

Would the outtakes be called m:bash? ;-) Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 14:54, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Waiting for the next episode. --Bhadani 17:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Page is a fine example of NPO. However, it lacks references and is based on conjectures and wild imagination. I am sure that the next episode shall be better one, with a new cast and crew. Let us pray that the page becomes a FP, that is, a Featured Page, shortly to be initiated by a bunch of imaginative wikipedians. --Bhadani 17:50, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Here's the sequel: Wikipedia II: The Users Strike Back. --116.14.26.124 (talk) 02:31, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

The articles gone, I just saved and all there is is my edit what is going on?

†he Bread 05:46, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Harassment

This page has some statements made to ridicule a former Wikipedian, albeit (s)he is banned. My attempts to remove this childish nonsense were reverted by someone who already had a previous dispute with me. I can't be bothered to deal with this right now, but this needs to go and I will probably return later to finish this off.--Konstable 06:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

I do not agree with your claim that NPA prevents us from making light of proven vandals. Raul654 06:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

This is a bit more than "making light". I see nothing funny about ridiculig little girls. She has over 1000 good edits in case you were not aware, so I hardly see how a blanket "vandal" tag applies. I know a couple of users who have been in trouble for vandalism, they are still here and editing, heck even those who have been indefinitely banned sometimes come back and edit peacefully - WP:NPA still applies to them, and WP:NPA applies to Cute 1 4 u. I see no exceptions on the policy page.--Konstable 07:36, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

If you want to remove all personal attacks on this page, you may want to quickly scan WP:BJAODN for personal attacks and liable statements. Your taking a page created for humor way too seriously. Notice at top of the page states: It is not intended, nor should it be used, for any research or serious use. None of this is legit and your reverting is inappropriate. — Moe 17:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

And another quick question would be what exactly is the personal attack your trying to remove because you stated it was "ridiculig [sic] little girls", which I don't see that, or maybe I missed the attack upon little girls. If you saying that "User:Cute 1 4 u is a vandal" is a personal attack, maybe Willy on Wheels should be offended by the former long term abuse section we had on him. — Moe 17:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

I think there is a difference between a 12 year old girl and somebody running multiple vandal bots. You know like age, maturity, and culpability. Anyhow, adults mocking a pre-teen girl, reflects more on themselves than their target. It actually comes across as quite pathetic. And you seem to have taken a a tip from kizzle's guide. — MichaelLinnear 01:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

I disagree with your personal attack in calling me a dick. Once again, I don't see the attack upon "little girls", there is no attack. The only reason you think it's an attack upon little girls is because Cute 1 4 u's account was actually controlled by a pre-teen, had you not known that, you wouldn't think there was a 'personal attack on little girls' at all because all Cute 1 4 u would be is a indefblocked user. — Moe 06:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

A famous character called Austin Powers once said to someone with a mole on his face, "Moooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooole... Nice to mole you...meet you! Nice to meet you, Mole!" B.t.w. was she a Fembot because we could probably integrate that with the Austin Powers thingy--CyclePat 04:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Aw, come on. I just read the whole Cute 1 4 u part and I saw no personal attack in it. Besides, even if she alleged she was a pre-teen, we have no way of proving that... This is just for fun, don't get all serious like most of you guys do with uploading pictures...please! 67.41.162.222 04:12, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

The Poster

can't someone animate that gif and make it into an actual ad?Garrie 05:33, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations

Your movie site is now located on my BJAODN. — Rickyrab | Talk 14:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

EVEN BIGGER CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!

I am now going to turn this into an actual movie via The Movies pc game !!! all i need now is your permission! Darkside2000 13:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)\

You don't have to ask. It's under the GFDL. -- Andrew Hampe ^Talk 17:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

I have started filming. It will be ready in a few days.Darkside2000 11:57, 11 September 2007 (UTC) The Movie is finished!!!!!!Darkside2000 08:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

The End of Wikipedia:The Movie

I wrote an end to "Wikipedia:The Movie" after reading about half of the script, but I changed The End so that the movie could continue. Oddmartian2 16:38, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

The movie lacks a general direction. Is there a point or are we doing some Seinfield show or something? --CyclePat (talk) 06:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

If it lacks direction, then speak to Raul :) But I kind of like how it's pointless. Oddmartian2 (talk) 15:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

wow

wow, this is random :D but a good idea. I may consider creating a flash movie of it ;) Cf38 (talk) 21:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Cute 4 u

I think it should be Miley Cyrus... I would much prefer to make fun of her. Consensus please: Basketball110 _hello 04:06, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Keep Hilary Duff. Cute 1 4 u was meant to be one of the stereotypical dumb blondes, not a Southern belle. 71.213.92.31 (talk) 19:17, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Sequel?

I'm thinking of writing a sequel to this movie, but I don't know where to start. Can you (or anyone else) give me a general sense of where to start? Thanks. --Drahcir ^{my talk} 01:33, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Never mind--i've got it started here. I'm barely through scene 2 though. --Drahcir ^{my talk} 02:18, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

So, I've got it started, and I need others to add ideas and stuff.

Hello. You seem to have lost interest in it. I'm continuing the journey of the sequal that you've begun. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 14:50, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

And here's the third movie. I'm planning to add movies 4, 5, and 6 sometime soon, and I have plans for some awesome scenes I want to add! Hope you see them! Whoop whoop pull up (talk) 01:00, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

The sequel is way better. Geekpotato24 (talk) 23:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Where should the flim be released?

I actually made Wikipedia the movie many months ago and added scenes that appeared here. I don't know where it should be released. Or even if it should. Discuss on my talk page.

p.s look at the article what the wikipedian saw on the dept of fun talk page and please add to it. --Darkside2000 (talk) 09:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

"Be Funny not Stupid"

This article clearly violates Wikipedia's prime directive: Be Funny Not Stupid

Seriously, it's cringe-makingly, embarrassingly unfunny

Wikipedia's great for many things, but if I want wacky humour I'll go read Conservapedia

HieronymousCrowley (talk) 06:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry?Not funny? Isn't that a POV?Assistant N (talk) 19:47, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

funny

I thought it was funny. jp×g 19:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)