RaySmall88

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Sideswipe9th (talk) 01:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Rapid-onset gender dysphoria controversy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 01:57, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Irreversible Damage. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sideswipe9th (talk) 20:39, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, RaySmall88, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mathglot (talk) 02:14, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Early difficulties at a gender-related article

Hi again, Ray. I can see that you've gotten off to a bit of a rocky start; that's unfortunate, but sometimes happens with new editors, especially if you happen to choose a particularly controversial article as your first article at Wikipedia, as you did with the highly controversial Rapid-onset gender dysphoria controversy (the word controversy is even in the title!) It's hard enough for a new editor to learn the ropes of editing here on regular articles on sleepy topics like medieval Catalonian peasant wars; on a topic like the one you chose, I would say it's as close to impossible as you can get, and is chock full of land mines and traps.

There's lots more I could say, and if you are still interested in editing at Wikipedia after your short block is over, and want some ideas of what to do next just {{ping}} me or write to me on my Talk page and I'll try to help you. Based on long years of experience and helping new editors, if you head straight back to the article where you had the trouble (or a similar one), you will more than likely end up blocked again, and for a longer period next time, so I'd recommend you avoid that for now.

You can still come back and become a successful editor here after that hiccup, if you wish to. I look forward to hearing from you. (P.S., you are not blocked from this one page, so if you want to talk to me without waiting for your block to expire, you can do so below; use the {{Reply to}} template.) Good luck, Mathglot (talk) 02:33, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

I see that your block has expired, and you have headed back to the ROGD article, where your next edit was immediately reverted. Since then, you've spent the rest of the time at the Talk page. You're free to do what you wish (within the constraints of Wikipedia policies and guidelines), but up to this point, all of your edits are related to this controversy, either at this article or at Irreversible Damage which covers a book that deals extensively with the same topic.

It's a bit early to see if this is the beginning of some lasting pattern of editing on your part, or is just where you happened to start out, and soon you'll be fixing articles on the Economy of Ghana or anything else that interests you. I'll just let you know for your own benefit, that there is a Wikipedia notion of editors who come here not really to improve the encyclopedia as a whole, but rather mainly to "right great wrongs" as they see it. This never works, and they end up leaving or getting blocked. I hope you're not headed in that direction. Diversifying the set of articles you edit would be a great learning experience for you, as well as introduce you to other issues of editing Wikipedia, and avoid the land mines inherent to a highly controversial article like ROGD. Whatever you decide to do, I wish you the best of luck. Feel free to ask me questions on my Talk page, any time. Mathglot (talk) 05:31, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Standard ArbCom sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Newimpartial (talk) 23:57, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert - biographies of living people

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Sideswipe9th (talk) 02:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for tendentious editing in the GENSEX discretionary sanctions area, BLP violations, and repeated abuse of logged-out editing to edit war after a previous sanction (see 204.16.88.0/21 and special:redirect/logid/135667231).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 09:21, 27 August 2022 (UTC)