Raymond88824

Bushranger may not change this page.

No personal attacks

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:The Bushranger‎. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. - Ahunt (talk) 00:09, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  Acroterion (talk) 00:14, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raymond88824 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I removed the legal threats prior to the banning incident, I been head hunted here cause I upset someone. Ray-Rays 04:43, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Merely deleting your legal threat is not sufficient. You are required to specifically state that you disavow any legal threat made by you against Wikipedia and any of its editors in relation to any edit made here, and that you agree not to make any such threats in the future. Please also note that you have no right to prevent any editor from commenting on your page, although you retain the right to take action thereon if the edits made are not acceptable in terms of Wikipedia policies or procedures.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:59, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There were a dozen better options for your indefinite blocking, but, as Acroterion has blocked you for making legal threats (banned on Wikipedia- even the use of the words 'defamatory' or 'libellous' will lead to a block) Here is why you will remain blocked indefinitely:

Your legal threat:

• Severely inhibits free editing of pages, a concept that is absolutely necessary to ensure that Wikipedia remains neutral. Without this freedom, we risk one side of a dispute intimidating the other, thus causing a systemic bias in our articles.

• Creates bad feelings and a lack of trust amongst the community, damaging our ability to proceed quickly and efficiently with an assumption of mutual good faith.

We have had bad experiences with users who have made legal threats in the past. By making legal threats, you may damage your reputation on Wikipedia.

Hope the policy has been explained for you. Luxure (talk) 16:08, 25 September 2014 (AEST)

• Reviewing admin should see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Legal threat. Neatsfoot (talk) 07:27, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

GUESS WIKI LOST A GOOD USER, GAINED A NIGHT MARE

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raymond88824 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

>USER MAKES 400 GOOD EDITS >POST LEGAL THREAT ON PAGE

>ASKED TO REMOVE IT

>REMOVES IT

>GETS BANNED

>APPEALS

>SAYS EVEN YOU REMOVED IT, ITS TO LATE

>USER NOW GOING TO VANDALISE WIKI FOR YEARS IF NOT UNBANNED

Decline reason:

Interesting, this is two first law of holes violations I've seen in two days. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 00:23, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you're trying to prove that I was mistaken in blocking you, your strategy needs some work. Besides, you were also blocked for personal attacks on other editors, contributing to what Wikipedia regards as an attack page, and abusing userspace as social media. You've never addressed those issues. Now you're going to have to address why you think that threats of vandalism are appropriate in an unblock request, and how that can possibly be reconciled with becoming a productive contributor. Acroterion (talk) 14:11, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Just removing the legal threat from wherever it was posted is not enough; you must unambiguously retract it. Not to mention admins and editors generally have a lot more patience than your average vandal. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 21:14, 26 September 2014 (UTC)