June 2008
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page T.O.S. (Terminate on Sight) has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'img[0-9]+\.imageshack\.us/img[0-9]+/.*\.(jpg|jpeg|png|gif|bmp|tif|tiff|swf)' . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 23:29, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
What makes a review professional?
editWhy does it matter if the original version of the review has a few spelling mistakes, when the version that I see is grammatically correct?
The fact is that NeuFutur Magazine has been around a decade, and the review that is up now - Smooth Magazine - is a lot more airy and does not get into the meat of the discussion of the album at all. The NeuFutur Magazine review actually discusses what is up with the music and discusses the influences of the album, rather than creating bland platitudes about the band.
I sincerely hope you can get back in touch with me. Drakulon (talk) 01:54, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Again, what is "professionally written"?
editWhat things make the Smooth Magazine piece professionally written and NeuFutur Magazine's not? The reviewer (if what you are saying is true) only had minor cosmetic errors that could likely have been created by Microsoft Word auto-correcting words. I understand if you like G-Unit; I do too, but it is tremendously important to have pieces on both sides of the aisle.
The Smooth review is short as all get out and doesn't look into the actual rap; regardless of the type of the review, I still don't see how stealing a page out of Smooth Magazine, scanning it, and putting it on Wikipedia is not infringing on Smooth's rights. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drakulon (talk • contribs) 02:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
I'll stop updating the G-Unit page, but...
editTake a look at some of NeuFutur's other rap reviews. I think you will see that they have someone on staff that knows a little about rap, and really gets into independent rap more than anything. I don't know who that James person is (random reviewer, maybe?), but he sounds like a tool.
http://neufutur.com/?p=3265 - Metermaid http://neufutur.com/?p=3507 - Saiah http://neufutur.com/?p=2712 - Fat Ray and Black Milk http://neufutur.com/?p=2337 - The Lady Tigra
Some other major stuff:
http://neufutur.com/?p=2877 - Busta / Linkin Park http://neufutur.com/?p=2388 - All Crazy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drakulon (talk • contribs) 02:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
July 2008
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page T.O.S. (Terminate on Sight) has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\btypepad\.com\b' (link(s): http://binside.typepad.com/binside_tv/2008/06/hardcore-and-fo.html) .
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 06:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page T.O.S. (Terminate on Sight) has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\btypepad\.com\b' .
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 17:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page T.O.S. (Terminate on Sight) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'img[0-9]+\.imageshack\.us/img[0-9]+/.*\.(jpg|jpeg|png|gif|bmp|tif|tiff|swf)' . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 17:54, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Warnings
edit
Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. —slakr\ talk / 18:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)